Which has the lower trailing P/E, KEYS or NTES?

NTES has the lower trailing P/E: KEYS trades at 52.98 and NTES at 16.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, KEYS or NTES?

Over the past five years, NTES grew revenue faster — KEYS at a 6.22% CAGR versus NTES at 6.78%.

Does KEYS or NTES pay a bigger dividend?

NTES pays a dividend (2.50% yield), while KEYS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is KEYS or NTES more profitable?

NTES runs the higher net margin — KEYS at 19.08% versus NTES at 27.87%.

How have KEYS and NTES total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, KEYS delivered 28.34% and NTES delivered 11.04% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) vs NetEase, Inc. (NTES)

A side-by-side comparison of Keysight Technologies, Inc. and NetEase, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

KEYS

Keysight Technologies, Inc.

$65.73B

$384.64TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT

NTES

NetEase, Inc.

$74.83B

$117.21TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — KEYS vs NTES

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

KEYS +1126.9% (+28.5%/yr)NTES +185.1% (+11.0%/yr)KEYS compounded faster over this window

KEYS NTES

KEYS vs NTES: by the numbers

•NTES is the larger company ($74.83B vs $65.73B market cap).
•NTES trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.23 vs 52.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NTES converts more revenue to profit (27.87% vs 19.08% net margin).
•NTES grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.78% vs 6.22% CAGR).
•NTES pays a dividend (2.50% yield), while KEYS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KEYS	NTES
P/E ratio	52.98	16.23
Forward P/E	33.57	N/A
PEG ratio	6.61	0.74
P/S ratio	9.99	4.46
P/B ratio	10.00	3.04
EV / EBITDA	41.77	11.65
FCF yield	2.23%	9.58%

Profitability

Metric	KEYS	NTES
Gross margin	64.69%	67.20%
Operating margin	20.25%	35.32%
Net margin	19.08%	27.87%
ROE	19.11%	19.00%
ROIC	12.04%	17.31%

Dividends

Metric	KEYS	NTES
Dividend yield	N/A	2.50%
Payout ratio	N/A	40.58%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KEYS	NTES
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.22%	6.78%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.90%	22.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.82%	18.25%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.38%	9.30%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, KEYS or NTES?: NTES has the lower trailing P/E: KEYS trades at 52.98 and NTES at 16.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, KEYS or NTES?: Over the past five years, NTES grew revenue faster — KEYS at a 6.22% CAGR versus NTES at 6.78%.
Does KEYS or NTES pay a bigger dividend?: NTES pays a dividend (2.50% yield), while KEYS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is KEYS or NTES more profitable?: NTES runs the higher net margin — KEYS at 19.08% versus NTES at 27.87%.
How have KEYS and NTES total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, KEYS delivered 28.34% and NTES delivered 11.04% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KEYS analysis Full NTES analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Keysight Technologies P/E ratio NetEase P/E ratio NetEase dividend yield Keysight Technologies ROE NetEase ROE Keysight Technologies operating margin NetEase operating margin Keysight Technologies revenue growth NetEase revenue growth Keysight Technologies free cash flow NetEase free cash flow

Keysight Technologies & NetEase appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 3, 2026.