Which has the lower trailing P/E, K or STZ?

STZ has the lower trailing P/E: K trades at 22.90 and STZ at 12.43. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, K or STZ?

Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.

Does K or STZ pay a bigger dividend?

K yields 1.39% and STZ yields 3.14% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is K or STZ more profitable?

STZ runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus STZ at 20.14%.

How have K and STZ total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, K delivered 5.79% and STZ delivered -0.70% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kellanova (K) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

A side-by-side comparison of Kellanova and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Kellanova

$29.03B

$83.44Consumer DefensiveAt close: Dec 10, 2025, 4:00 PM ET

STZ

Constellation Brands, Inc.

$22.24B

$130.23Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — K vs STZ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 29y

K +489.0%STZ +4809.1%STZ compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

K STZ

K vs STZ: by the numbers

•K is the larger company ($29.03B vs $22.24B market cap).
•STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.43 vs 22.90 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•STZ converts more revenue to profit (20.14% vs 10.08% net margin).
•STZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.86% vs -1.30% CAGR).
•STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 1.39%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	K	STZ
P/E ratio	22.90	12.43
Forward P/E	22.06	11.19
P/S ratio	2.30	2.48
P/B ratio	6.95	2.72
PEG ratio	0.50	N/A
EV / EBITDA	15.83	9.90
FCF yield	2.05%	8.17%

Profitability

Metric	K	STZ
Gross margin	34.81%	52.62%
Operating margin	14.61%	32.14%
Net margin	10.08%	20.14%
ROE	30.38%	22.10%
ROIC	12.91%	10.48%

Dividends

Metric	K	STZ
Dividend yield	1.39%	3.14%
Payout ratio	29.59%	42.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	K	STZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.30%	0.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.30%	-1.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.94%	-1.73%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.22%	-8.55%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, K or STZ?: STZ has the lower trailing P/E: K trades at 22.90 and STZ at 12.43. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, K or STZ?: Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
Does K or STZ pay a bigger dividend?: K yields 1.39% and STZ yields 3.14% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is K or STZ more profitable?: STZ runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus STZ at 20.14%.
How have K and STZ total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, K delivered 5.79% and STZ delivered -0.70% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full K analysis Full STZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kellanova P/E ratio Constellation Brands P/E ratio Kellanova dividend yield Constellation Brands dividend yield Kellanova ROE Constellation Brands ROE Kellanova operating margin Constellation Brands operating margin Kellanova revenue growth Constellation Brands revenue growth Kellanova free cash flow Constellation Brands free cash flow

Kellanova & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.