On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and STZ at 15.49.

Which has grown faster, K or STZ?

Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.

Does K or STZ pay a bigger dividend?

K yields 1.39% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is K or STZ more profitable?

STZ runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus STZ at 18.46%.

Which has been the better investment, K or STZ?

Over the past 10-year, K delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kellanova (K) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

STZ leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Kellanova and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Kellanova

$29.03B

$83.44Consumer Defensive

STZ

Constellation Brands, Inc.

$25.47B

$148.51Consumer Defensive

Total return — K vs STZ

growth of $100 · last 29y

K +152.3%STZ +3457.6%STZ compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

K STZ

K vs STZ: by the numbers

•K is the larger company ($29.03B vs $25.47B market cap).
•STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 22.90 P/E).
•STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 10.08% net margin).
•STZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.19% vs -1.30% CAGR).
•STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 1.39%).

Which is better, K or STZ?

Metric tally: K 5 · STZ 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSTZ(lower P/E)

GrowthSTZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)

QualityK(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	K	STZ
P/E ratio	22.90	15.49●
Forward P/E	22.06	11.90●
P/S ratio	2.30●	2.82
P/B ratio	6.95	3.19●
PEG ratio	0.51	—
EV / EBITDA	15.66	11.70●
FCF yield	2.05%	6.95%●

Profitability

Metric	K	STZ
Gross margin	34.81%	51.67%●
Operating margin	14.61%	31.33%●
Net margin	10.08%	18.46%●
ROE	30.38%●	20.87%
ROIC	12.91%●	10.48%

Dividends

Metric	K	STZ
Dividend yield	1.39%	2.75%●
Payout ratio	29.59%	42.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	K	STZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.30%	1.19%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.30%●	-1.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-15.22%	-1.57%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.22%●	-7.36%

Frequently asked

Which is better, K or STZ?: It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: STZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: K (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 11 to 5.
Is K or STZ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
Which has grown faster, K or STZ?: Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
Does K or STZ pay a bigger dividend?: K yields 1.39% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is K or STZ more profitable?: STZ runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus STZ at 18.46%.
Which has been the better investment, K or STZ?: Over the past 10-year, K delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full K analysis Full STZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kellanova P/E ratio Constellation Brands P/E ratio Kellanova dividend yield Constellation Brands dividend yield Kellanova ROE Constellation Brands ROE Kellanova operating margin Constellation Brands operating margin Kellanova revenue growth Constellation Brands revenue growth Kellanova free cash flow Constellation Brands free cash flow

Kellanova & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.