On trailing earnings, K is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and KR at 42.02.

Which has grown faster, K or KR?

Over the past five years, KR grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus KR at 2.19%.

Does K or KR pay a bigger dividend?

K yields 1.39% and KR yields 2.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is K or KR more profitable?

K runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus KR at 0.69%.

Which has been the better investment, K or KR?

Over the past 10-year, KR delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus KR at 8.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kellanova (K) vs The Kroger Co. (KR)

KR leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though K is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Kellanova and The Kroger Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Kellanova

$29.03B

$83.44Consumer Defensive

The Kroger Co.

$39.90B

$64.71Consumer Defensive

Total return — K vs KR

growth of $100 · last 29y

K +152.3%KR +1199.6%KR compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

K KR

K vs KR: by the numbers

•KR is the larger company ($39.90B vs $29.03B market cap).
•K trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.90 vs 42.02 P/E).
•K converts more revenue to profit (10.08% vs 0.69% net margin).
•KR grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.19% vs -1.30% CAGR).
•KR pays the higher dividend yield (2.16% vs 1.39%).

Which is better, K or KR?

Metric tally: K 7 · KR 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueK(lower P/E)

GrowthKR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeKR(higher dividend yield)

QualityK(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	K	KR
P/E ratio	22.90●	42.02
Forward P/E	22.06	11.53●
P/S ratio	2.30	0.28●
P/B ratio	6.95	6.89
PEG ratio	0.51	—
EV / EBITDA	15.66	10.80●
FCF yield	2.05%	8.64%●

Profitability

Metric	K	KR
Gross margin	34.81%●	23.30%
Operating margin	14.61%●	1.28%
Net margin	10.08%●	0.69%
ROE	30.38%●	17.14%
ROIC	12.91%●	4.70%

Dividends

Metric	K	KR
Dividend yield	1.39%	2.16%●
Payout ratio	29.59%	89.74%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	K	KR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.30%	2.19%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.30%●	-13.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-15.22%	-2.23%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.22%	13.20%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, K or KR?: It depends on your goal. value: K (lower P/E); growth: KR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KR (higher dividend yield); quality: K (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KR leads 8 to 7.
Is K or KR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, K is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and KR at 42.02.
Which has grown faster, K or KR?: Over the past five years, KR grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus KR at 2.19%.
Does K or KR pay a bigger dividend?: K yields 1.39% and KR yields 2.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is K or KR more profitable?: K runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus KR at 0.69%.
Which has been the better investment, K or KR?: Over the past 10-year, KR delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus KR at 8.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full K analysis Full KR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kellanova P/E ratio Kroger P/E ratio Kellanova dividend yield Kroger dividend yield Kellanova ROE Kroger ROE Kellanova operating margin Kroger operating margin Kellanova revenue growth Kroger revenue growth Kellanova free cash flow Kroger free cash flow

Kellanova & Kroger appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.