Which has the lower trailing P/E, K or KMB?

KMB has the lower trailing P/E: K trades at 22.90 and KMB at 17.75. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, K or KMB?

Over the past five years, K grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.

Does K or KMB pay a bigger dividend?

K yields 1.39% and KMB yields 4.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is K or KMB more profitable?

KMB runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus KMB at 12.81%.

How have K and KMB total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, K delivered 5.79% and KMB delivered 2.13% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kellanova (K) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)

A side-by-side comparison of Kellanova and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Kellanova

$29.03B

$83.44Consumer DefensiveAt close: Dec 10, 2025, 4:00 PM ET

KMB

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

$37.44B

$112.79Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 11:45 AM EDT

Total return — K vs KMB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 29y

K +489.0%KMB +637.8%KMB compounded faster

K KMB

K vs KMB: by the numbers

•KMB is the larger company ($37.44B vs $29.03B market cap).
•KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.75 vs 22.90 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•KMB converts more revenue to profit (12.81% vs 10.08% net margin).
•K grew revenue faster over the past five years (-1.30% vs -2.61% CAGR).
•KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.49% vs 1.39%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	K	KMB
P/E ratio	22.90	17.75
Forward P/E	22.06	15.03
P/S ratio	2.30	2.28
P/B ratio	6.95	20.98
PEG ratio	0.50	N/A
EV / EBITDA	15.83	15.57
FCF yield	2.05%	6.84%

Profitability

Metric	K	KMB
Gross margin	34.81%	35.86%
Operating margin	14.61%	13.27%
Net margin	10.08%	12.81%
ROE	30.38%	117.98%
ROIC	12.91%	17.41%

Dividends

Metric	K	KMB
Dividend yield	1.39%	4.49%
Payout ratio	29.59%	83.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	K	KMB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.30%	-2.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.30%	-2.50%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.94%	-8.19%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.22%	0.28%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, K or KMB?: KMB has the lower trailing P/E: K trades at 22.90 and KMB at 17.75. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, K or KMB?: Over the past five years, K grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.
Does K or KMB pay a bigger dividend?: K yields 1.39% and KMB yields 4.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is K or KMB more profitable?: KMB runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus KMB at 12.81%.
How have K and KMB total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, K delivered 5.79% and KMB delivered 2.13% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full K analysis Full KMB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kellanova P/E ratio Kimberly-Clark P/E ratio Kellanova dividend yield Kimberly-Clark dividend yield Kellanova ROE Kimberly-Clark ROE Kellanova operating margin Kimberly-Clark operating margin Kellanova revenue growth Kimberly-Clark revenue growth Kellanova free cash flow Kimberly-Clark free cash flow

Kellanova & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.