On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and KMB at 16.06.

Which has grown faster, K or KMB?

Over the past five years, K grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.

Does K or KMB pay a bigger dividend?

K yields 1.39% and KMB yields 4.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is K or KMB more profitable?

KMB runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus KMB at 12.81%.

Which has been the better investment, K or KMB?

Over the past 10-year, K delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus KMB at 1.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kellanova (K) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)

KMB leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Kellanova and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Kellanova

$29.03B

$83.44Consumer Defensive

KMB

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

$33.95B

$102.29Consumer Defensive

Total return — K vs KMB

growth of $100 · last 29y

K +152.3%KMB +198.7%KMB compounded faster

K KMB

K vs KMB: by the numbers

•KMB is the larger company ($33.95B vs $29.03B market cap).
•KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.06 vs 22.90 P/E).
•KMB converts more revenue to profit (12.81% vs 10.08% net margin).
•K grew revenue faster over the past five years (-1.30% vs -2.61% CAGR).
•KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 1.39%).

Which is better, K or KMB?

Metric tally: K 5 · KMB 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueKMB(lower P/E)

GrowthK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)

QualityKMB(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	K	KMB
P/E ratio	22.90	16.06●
Forward P/E	22.06	13.49●
P/S ratio	2.30	2.06●
P/B ratio	6.95●	18.98
PEG ratio	0.51	—
EV / EBITDA	15.66	13.26●
FCF yield	2.05%	7.56%●

Profitability

Metric	K	KMB
Gross margin	34.81%	35.86%●
Operating margin	14.61%●	13.27%
Net margin	10.08%	12.81%●
ROE	30.38%	117.98%●
ROIC	12.91%	17.62%●

Dividends

Metric	K	KMB
Dividend yield	1.39%	4.97%●
Payout ratio	29.59%	83.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	K	KMB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.30%●	-2.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.30%●	-2.50%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-15.22%	3.38%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.22%●	-0.94%

Frequently asked

Which is better, K or KMB?: It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: K (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KMB leads 11 to 5.
Is K or KMB cheaper?: On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and KMB at 16.06.
Which has grown faster, K or KMB?: Over the past five years, K grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.
Does K or KMB pay a bigger dividend?: K yields 1.39% and KMB yields 4.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is K or KMB more profitable?: KMB runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus KMB at 12.81%.
Which has been the better investment, K or KMB?: Over the past 10-year, K delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus KMB at 1.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full K analysis Full KMB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kellanova P/E ratio Kimberly-Clark P/E ratio Kellanova dividend yield Kimberly-Clark dividend yield Kellanova ROE Kimberly-Clark ROE Kellanova operating margin Kimberly-Clark operating margin Kellanova revenue growth Kimberly-Clark revenue growth Kellanova free cash flow Kimberly-Clark free cash flow

Kellanova & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.