Which has grown faster, K or KHC?

Over the past five years, KHC grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus KHC at -1.11%.

Does K or KHC pay a bigger dividend?

K yields 1.39% and KHC yields 6.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is K or KHC more profitable?

K runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus KHC at -23.05%.

Which has been the better investment, K or KHC?

Over the past 10-year, K delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus KHC at -7.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kellanova (K) vs The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC)

K and KHC are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.

A side-by-side comparison of Kellanova and The Kraft Heinz Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Kellanova

$29.03B

$83.44Consumer Defensive

KHC

The Kraft Heinz Company

$28.92B

$24.39Consumer Defensive

Total return — K vs KHC

growth of $100 · last 10y

K +41.7%KHC -66.6%K compounded faster

K KHC

K vs KHC: by the numbers

•K is the larger company ($29.03B vs $28.92B market cap).
•K is profitable (10.08% net margin) while KHC runs a net loss (-23.05%).
•KHC grew revenue faster over the past five years (-1.11% vs -1.30% CAGR).
•KHC pays the higher dividend yield (6.56% vs 1.39%).

Which is better, K or KHC?

Metric tally: K 7 · KHC 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthKHC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeKHC(higher dividend yield)

QualityK(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	K	KHC
P/E ratio	22.90	—
Forward P/E	22.06	11.77●
P/S ratio	2.30	1.16●
P/B ratio	6.95	0.69●
PEG ratio	0.51	—
EV / EBITDA	15.66	—
FCF yield	2.05%	13.62%●

Profitability

Metric	K	KHC
Gross margin	34.81%●	33.33%
Operating margin	14.61%●	-19.16%
Net margin	10.08%●	-23.05%
ROE	30.38%●	-13.74%
ROIC	12.91%●	-6.23%

Dividends

Metric	K	KHC
Dividend yield	1.39%	6.56%●
Payout ratio	29.59%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	K	KHC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.30%	-1.11%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.30%●	-17.92%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-15.22%	-3.99%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.22%●	-6.40%

Frequently asked

Which is better, K or KHC?: It depends on your goal. growth: KHC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KHC (higher dividend yield); quality: K (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Which has grown faster, K or KHC?: Over the past five years, KHC grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus KHC at -1.11%.
Does K or KHC pay a bigger dividend?: K yields 1.39% and KHC yields 6.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is K or KHC more profitable?: K runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus KHC at -23.05%.
Which has been the better investment, K or KHC?: Over the past 10-year, K delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus KHC at -7.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full K analysis Full KHC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kellanova P/E ratio Kraft Heinz P/E ratio Kellanova dividend yield Kraft Heinz dividend yield Kellanova ROE Kraft Heinz ROE Kellanova operating margin Kraft Heinz operating margin Kellanova revenue growth Kraft Heinz revenue growth Kellanova free cash flow Kraft Heinz free cash flow

Kellanova & Kraft Heinz appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.