Julong Holding Limited (JLHL) vs Namib Minerals (NAMM)
A side-by-side comparison of Julong Holding Limited and Namib Minerals across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
JLHL
Julong Holding Limited
$3.92Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:49 PM EDT
NAMM
Namib Minerals
$1.17Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:49 PM EDT
Total return — JLHL vs NAMM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yJLHL -6.9% (-6.9%/yr)NAMM -88.0% (-88.0%/yr)JLHL compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
JLHL NAMM
JLHL vs NAMM: by the numbers
- •JLHL is the larger company ($80M vs $63M market cap).
- •NAMM converts more revenue to profit (125.43% vs 10.38% net margin).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | JLHL | NAMM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 0.77 |
| P/S ratio | N/A | 0.77 |
| P/B ratio | 6.89 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 0.56 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 4.85% |
Profitability
| Metric | JLHL | NAMM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 16.07% | 41.45% |
| Operating margin | 12.25% | 14.90% |
| Net margin | 10.38% | 125.43% |
| ROE | 36.97% | N/A |
| ROIC | 32.33% | N/A |
Frequently asked
- Is JLHL or NAMM more profitable?
- NAMM runs the higher net margin — JLHL at 10.38% versus NAMM at 125.43%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Namib Minerals P/E ratioJulong ROENamib Minerals ROEJulong operating marginNamib Minerals operating marginJulong revenue growthNamib Minerals revenue growthJulong free cash flowNamib Minerals free cash flow
Julong & Namib Minerals appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.