Which has the lower trailing P/E, JJSF or SENEB?

SENEB has the lower trailing P/E: JJSF trades at 30.52 and SENEB at 10.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, JJSF or SENEB?

Over the past five years, JJSF grew revenue faster — JJSF at a 7.26% CAGR versus SENEB at 3.61%.

Does JJSF or SENEB pay a bigger dividend?

JJSF pays a dividend (5.12% yield), while SENEB is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is JJSF or SENEB more profitable?

SENEB runs the higher net margin — JJSF at 3.23% versus SENEB at 6.75%.

How have JJSF and SENEB total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, JJSF delivered -2.35% and SENEB delivered 17.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) vs Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB)

A side-by-side comparison of J&J Snack Foods Corp. and Seneca Foods Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

JJSF

J&J Snack Foods Corp.

$1.48B

$79.17Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:50 PM EDT

SENEB

Seneca Foods Corporation

$1.22B

$174.68Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:37 PM EDT

Total return — JJSF vs SENEB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

JJSF -20.8% (-2.3%/yr)SENEB +407.7% (+17.6%/yr)SENEB compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

JJSF SENEB

JJSF vs SENEB: by the numbers

•JJSF is the larger company ($1.48B vs $1.22B market cap).
•SENEB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.09 vs 30.52 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SENEB converts more revenue to profit (6.75% vs 3.23% net margin).
•JJSF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.26% vs 3.61% CAGR).
•JJSF pays a dividend (5.12% yield), while SENEB is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	JJSF	SENEB
P/E ratio	30.52	10.09
Forward P/E	18.33	12.63
PEG ratio	1.07	2.61
P/S ratio	0.97	0.69
P/B ratio	1.66	1.57
EV / EBITDA	10.96	6.96
FCF yield	6.20%	18.86%

Profitability

Metric	JJSF	SENEB
Gross margin	31.07%	13.42%
Operating margin	4.61%	8.57%
Net margin	3.23%	6.75%
ROE	5.52%	15.40%
ROIC	4.86%	10.76%

Dividends

Metric	JJSF	SENEB
Dividend yield	5.12%	N/A
Payout ratio	154.20%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	JJSF	SENEB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.26%	3.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.27%	3.92%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.05%	14.74%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-10.67%	29.76%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, JJSF or SENEB?: SENEB has the lower trailing P/E: JJSF trades at 30.52 and SENEB at 10.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, JJSF or SENEB?: Over the past five years, JJSF grew revenue faster — JJSF at a 7.26% CAGR versus SENEB at 3.61%.
Does JJSF or SENEB pay a bigger dividend?: JJSF pays a dividend (5.12% yield), while SENEB is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is JJSF or SENEB more profitable?: SENEB runs the higher net margin — JJSF at 3.23% versus SENEB at 6.75%.
How have JJSF and SENEB total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, JJSF delivered -2.35% and SENEB delivered 17.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full JJSF analysis Full SENEB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

J&J Snack Foods P/E ratio Seneca Foods P/E ratio J&J Snack Foods dividend yield J&J Snack Foods ROE Seneca Foods ROE J&J Snack Foods operating margin Seneca Foods operating margin J&J Snack Foods revenue growth Seneca Foods revenue growth J&J Snack Foods free cash flow Seneca Foods free cash flow

J&J Snack Foods & Seneca Foods appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.