707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM) vs Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI)
Over the past year, NCI outperformed JEM — -93.78% vs -96.04% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares and Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — JEM vs NCI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yMetrics side by side
Did NCI beat JEM?
Over the past year, NCI outperformed JEM — -93.78% vs -96.04% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | JEM | NCI |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -96.04% | -93.78% |
JEM is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has NCI beaten JEM?
- Over the past year, NCI outperformed JEM — -93.78% vs -96.04% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.