iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)
Over the past 10 years, SMH outperformed IWM — 33.97% vs 10.42% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of iShares Russell 2000 ETF and VanEck Semiconductor ETF across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — IWM vs SMH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMetrics side by side
Did SMH beat IWM?
Over the past 10 years, SMH outperformed IWM — 33.97% vs 10.42% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | IWM | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 26.43% | 96.31% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 17.08% | 54.17% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.69% | 33.71% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 10.42% | 33.97% |
IWM is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has SMH beaten IWM?
- Over the past 10 years, SMH outperformed IWM — 33.97% vs 10.42% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 8, 2026.