iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) vs Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU)
Over the past 3 years, NU outperformed IWM — 30.07% vs 17.84% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Nu Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — IWM vs NU
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yMetrics side by side
Did NU beat IWM?
Over the past 3 years, NU outperformed IWM — 30.07% vs 17.84% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | IWM | NU |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 24.00% | -2.98% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 17.84% | 30.07% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.69% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 10.52% | N/A |
IWM is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has NU beaten IWM?
- Over the past 3 years, NU outperformed IWM — 30.07% vs 17.84% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.