iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)
Over the past 10 years, MRSH outperformed IWM — 11.57% vs 11.32% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — IWM vs MRSH
growth of $100 · last 26yMetrics side by side
Did MRSH beat IWM?
Over the past 10 years, MRSH outperformed IWM — 11.57% vs 11.32% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | IWM | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 40.70%● | -21.57% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 17.81%● | -1.16% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.33%● | 5.19% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 11.32% | 11.57%● |
IWM is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has MRSH beaten IWM?
- Over the past 10 years, MRSH outperformed IWM — 11.57% vs 11.32% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.