iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)
Over the past 10 years, MRSH outperformed IWM — 13.06% vs 10.55% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — IWM vs MRSH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 26yMetrics side by side
Did MRSH beat IWM?
Over the past 10 years, MRSH outperformed IWM — 13.06% vs 10.55% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | IWM | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 34.14% | -2.85% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 14.94% | 1.89% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.99% | 6.84% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 10.55% | 13.06% |
IWM is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has MRSH beaten IWM?
- Over the past 10 years, MRSH outperformed IWM — 13.06% vs 10.55% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.