iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) vs Moody's Corporation (MCO)
Over the past 10 years, MCO outperformed IWM — 17.01% vs 10.40% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Moody's Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — IWM vs MCO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMetrics side by side
Did MCO beat IWM?
Over the past 10 years, MCO outperformed IWM — 17.01% vs 10.40% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | IWM | MCO |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 22.97% | -6.85% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 17.43% | 12.09% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.68% | 4.98% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 10.40% | 17.01% |
IWM is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has MCO beaten IWM?
- Over the past 10 years, MCO outperformed IWM — 17.01% vs 10.40% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.