Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) vs Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO)
ISRG leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics, though TMO is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
$411.06Healthcare
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
$469.34Healthcare
Total return — ISRG vs TMO
growth of $100 · last 26yISRG +20149.3%TMO +2922.2%ISRG compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ISRG TMO
ISRG vs TMO: by the numbers
- •TMO is the larger company ($174.42B vs $145.58B market cap).
- •TMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.80 vs 49.83 P/E).
- •ISRG converts more revenue to profit (28.15% vs 15.18% net margin).
- •ISRG grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.39% vs 6.68% CAGR).
- •TMO pays a dividend (0.38% yield) while ISRG does not currently pay one.
Which is better, ISRG or TMO?
Metric tally: ISRG 10 · TMO 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTMO(lower P/E)
GrowthISRG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityISRG(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ISRG | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 49.83 | 25.80● |
| Forward P/E | 34.92 | 17.26● |
| P/S ratio | 13.98 | 3.87● |
| P/B ratio | 8.46 | 3.37● |
| PEG ratio | 3.17● | 4.51 |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.41 | 19.26● |
| FCF yield | 1.92% | 3.86%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ISRG | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 66.29%● | 39.41% |
| Operating margin | 30.45%● | 17.76% |
| Net margin | 28.15%● | 15.18% |
| ROE | 17.05%● | 13.21% |
| ROIC | 13.71%● | 7.58% |
Dividends
| Metric | ISRG | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.38% |
| Payout ratio | — | 10.13% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ISRG | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 18.39%● | 6.68% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.51%● | 1.99% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 16.61%● | -0.19% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.37%● | 0.45% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ISRG or TMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: TMO (lower P/E); growth: ISRG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ISRG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ISRG leads 10 to 6.
- Is ISRG or TMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TMO is cheaper: ISRG trades at a 49.83 P/E and TMO at 25.80.
- Which has grown faster, ISRG or TMO?
- Over the past five years, ISRG grew revenue faster — ISRG at a 18.39% CAGR versus TMO at 6.68%.
- Does ISRG or TMO pay a bigger dividend?
- TMO pays a dividend (0.38% yield) while ISRG does not currently pay one.
- Is ISRG or TMO more profitable?
- ISRG runs the higher net margin — ISRG at 28.15% versus TMO at 15.18%.
- Which has been the better investment, ISRG or TMO?
- Over the past 10-year, ISRG delivered the higher annualized total return — ISRG at 19.14% versus TMO at 12.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Intuitive Surgical P/E ratioThermo Fisher Scientific P/E ratioIntuitive Surgical dividend yieldThermo Fisher Scientific dividend yieldIntuitive Surgical ROEThermo Fisher Scientific ROEIntuitive Surgical operating marginThermo Fisher Scientific operating marginIntuitive Surgical revenue growthThermo Fisher Scientific revenue growthIntuitive Surgical free cash flowThermo Fisher Scientific free cash flow
Intuitive Surgical & Thermo Fisher Scientific appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.