Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) vs Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO)
A side-by-side comparison of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
$397.72HealthcareAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
$613.54HealthcareAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — ISRG vs TMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yISRG +422.4% (+18.0%/yr)TMO +314.4% (+15.3%/yr)ISRG compounded faster over this window
ISRG TMO
ISRG vs TMO: by the numbers
- •TMO is the larger company ($228.00B vs $140.51B market cap).
- •TMO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.00 vs 45.25 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ISRG converts more revenue to profit (28.45% vs 15.06% net margin).
- •ISRG grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.41% vs 5.00% CAGR).
- •TMO pays a dividend (0.29% yield), while ISRG has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ISRG | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.25 | 33.00 |
| Forward P/E | 36.83 | 24.46 |
| P/S ratio | 12.92 | 4.91 |
| P/B ratio | 7.85 | 4.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 33.04 | 25.34 |
| FCF yield | 2.26% | 3.22% |
Profitability
| Metric | ISRG | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 66.68% | 40.37% |
| Operating margin | 31.28% | 17.69% |
| Net margin | 28.45% | 15.06% |
| ROE | 17.28% | 13.25% |
| ROIC | 15.11% | 7.44% |
Dividends
| Metric | ISRG | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.29% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 10.13% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ISRG | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.41% | 5.00% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.51% | 1.99% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.17% | -1.83% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.48% | 2.43% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ISRG or TMO?
- TMO has the lower trailing P/E: ISRG trades at 45.25 and TMO at 33.00. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ISRG or TMO?
- Over the past five years, ISRG grew revenue faster — ISRG at a 16.41% CAGR versus TMO at 5.00%.
- Does ISRG or TMO pay a bigger dividend?
- TMO pays a dividend (0.29% yield), while ISRG has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is ISRG or TMO more profitable?
- ISRG runs the higher net margin — ISRG at 28.45% versus TMO at 15.06%.
- How have ISRG and TMO total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ISRG delivered 17.94% and TMO delivered 15.19% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Intuitive Surgical P/E ratioThermo Fisher Scientific P/E ratioThermo Fisher Scientific dividend yieldIntuitive Surgical ROEThermo Fisher Scientific ROEIntuitive Surgical operating marginThermo Fisher Scientific operating marginIntuitive Surgical revenue growthThermo Fisher Scientific revenue growthIntuitive Surgical free cash flowThermo Fisher Scientific free cash flow
Intuitive Surgical & Thermo Fisher Scientific appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.