Which has the lower trailing P/E, IRDM or MTCH?

MTCH has the lower trailing P/E: IRDM trades at 54.92 and MTCH at 14.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, IRDM or MTCH?

Over the past five years, IRDM grew revenue faster — IRDM at a 8.27% CAGR versus MTCH at 5.65%.

Does IRDM or MTCH pay a bigger dividend?

IRDM yields 1.27% and MTCH yields 1.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is IRDM or MTCH more profitable?

MTCH runs the higher net margin — IRDM at 10.55% versus MTCH at 20.17%.

How have IRDM and MTCH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, IRDM delivered 21.95% and MTCH delivered 11.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM) vs Match Group, Inc. (MTCH)

A side-by-side comparison of Iridium Communications Inc. and Match Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

IRDM

Iridium Communications Inc.

$5.12B

$48.33Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MTCH

Match Group, Inc.

$9.22B

$39.51Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — IRDM vs MTCH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

IRDM +589.2% (+21.3%/yr)MTCH +172.8% (+10.6%/yr)IRDM compounded faster over this window

IRDM MTCH

IRDM vs MTCH: by the numbers

•MTCH is the larger company ($9.22B vs $5.12B market cap).
•MTCH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.16 vs 54.92 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MTCH converts more revenue to profit (20.17% vs 10.55% net margin).
•IRDM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.27% vs 5.65% CAGR).
•MTCH pays the higher dividend yield (1.84% vs 1.27%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IRDM	MTCH
P/E ratio	54.92	14.16
Forward P/E	50.81	14.20
P/S ratio	5.79	2.63
P/B ratio	10.84	N/A
EV / EBITDA	15.82	11.12
FCF yield	5.63%	12.39%

Profitability

Metric	IRDM	MTCH
Gross margin	70.39%	74.80%
Operating margin	23.76%	28.15%
Net margin	10.55%	20.17%
ROE	19.74%	N/A
ROIC	6.43%	23.26%

Dividends

Metric	IRDM	MTCH
Dividend yield	1.27%	1.84%
Payout ratio	68.18%	27.96%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IRDM	MTCH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.27%	5.65%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	28.23%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.45%	7.01%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.34%	-23.12%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, IRDM or MTCH?: MTCH has the lower trailing P/E: IRDM trades at 54.92 and MTCH at 14.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, IRDM or MTCH?: Over the past five years, IRDM grew revenue faster — IRDM at a 8.27% CAGR versus MTCH at 5.65%.
Does IRDM or MTCH pay a bigger dividend?: IRDM yields 1.27% and MTCH yields 1.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is IRDM or MTCH more profitable?: MTCH runs the higher net margin — IRDM at 10.55% versus MTCH at 20.17%.
How have IRDM and MTCH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, IRDM delivered 21.95% and MTCH delivered 11.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IRDM analysis Full MTCH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Iridium Communications P/E ratio Match P/E ratio Iridium Communications dividend yield Match dividend yield Iridium Communications ROE Match ROE Iridium Communications operating margin Match operating margin Iridium Communications revenue growth Match revenue growth Iridium Communications free cash flow Match free cash flow

Iridium Communications & Match appear in these rankings

Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.