Which has the lower trailing P/E, IRDM or MTCH?

MTCH has the lower trailing P/E: IRDM trades at 56.57 and MTCH at 13.36. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, IRDM or MTCH?

Over the past five years, IRDM grew revenue faster — IRDM at a 8.27% CAGR versus MTCH at 5.65%.

Does IRDM or MTCH pay a bigger dividend?

IRDM yields 1.21% and MTCH yields 2.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is IRDM or MTCH more profitable?

MTCH runs the higher net margin — IRDM at 10.55% versus MTCH at 20.17%.

How have IRDM and MTCH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, IRDM delivered 20.09% and MTCH delivered 9.25% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM) vs Match Group, Inc. (MTCH)

A side-by-side comparison of Iridium Communications Inc. and Match Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 14, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

IRDM

Iridium Communications Inc.

$5.32B

$50.20Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MTCH

Match Group, Inc.

$8.85B

$37.95Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — IRDM vs MTCH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

IRDM +526.2% (+20.1%/yr)MTCH +130.5% (+8.7%/yr)IRDM compounded faster over this window

IRDM MTCH

IRDM vs MTCH: by the numbers

•MTCH is the larger company ($8.85B vs $5.32B market cap).
•MTCH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.36 vs 56.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MTCH converts more revenue to profit (20.17% vs 10.55% net margin).
•IRDM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.27% vs 5.65% CAGR).
•MTCH pays the higher dividend yield (2.09% vs 1.21%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IRDM	MTCH
P/E ratio	56.57	13.36
Forward P/E	48.52	13.50
P/S ratio	6.11	2.63
P/B ratio	11.43	N/A
EV / EBITDA	16.48	11.14
FCF yield	5.34%	12.36%

Profitability

Metric	IRDM	MTCH
Gross margin	70.39%	74.80%
Operating margin	23.76%	28.15%
Net margin	10.55%	20.17%
ROE	19.74%	-241.99%
ROIC	7.83%	18.50%

Dividends

Metric	IRDM	MTCH
Dividend yield	1.21%	2.09%
Payout ratio	56.07%	30.83%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IRDM	MTCH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.27%	5.65%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	28.23%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.45%	7.01%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.51%	-22.21%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, IRDM or MTCH?: MTCH has the lower trailing P/E: IRDM trades at 56.57 and MTCH at 13.36. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, IRDM or MTCH?: Over the past five years, IRDM grew revenue faster — IRDM at a 8.27% CAGR versus MTCH at 5.65%.
Does IRDM or MTCH pay a bigger dividend?: IRDM yields 1.21% and MTCH yields 2.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is IRDM or MTCH more profitable?: MTCH runs the higher net margin — IRDM at 10.55% versus MTCH at 20.17%.
How have IRDM and MTCH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, IRDM delivered 20.09% and MTCH delivered 9.25% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IRDM analysis Full MTCH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Iridium Communications P/E ratio Match P/E ratio Iridium Communications dividend yield Match dividend yield Iridium Communications ROE Match ROE Iridium Communications operating margin Match operating margin Iridium Communications revenue growth Match revenue growth Iridium Communications free cash flow Match free cash flow

Iridium Communications & Match appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 14, 2026.