Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) vs Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS)
OTIS leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ingersoll Rand Inc. and Otis Worldwide Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — IR vs OTIS
growth of $100 · last 6yIR +306.6%OTIS +61.7%IR compounded faster
IR OTIS
IR vs OTIS: by the numbers
- •IR is the larger company ($31.84B vs $28.08B market cap).
- •OTIS trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.47 vs 54.98 P/E).
- •OTIS converts more revenue to profit (10.11% vs 7.54% net margin).
- •IR grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.25% vs 2.11% CAGR).
- •OTIS pays the higher dividend yield (2.40% vs 0.10%).
Which is better, IR or OTIS?
Metric tally: IR 6 · OTIS 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueOTIS(lower P/E)
GrowthIR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeOTIS(higher dividend yield)
QualityOTIS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | IR | OTIS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 54.98 | 19.47● |
| Forward P/E | 23.21 | 15.54● |
| P/S ratio | 4.10 | 1.95● |
| P/B ratio | 3.14 | — |
| PEG ratio | 4.99 | 1.76● |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.69 | 14.74● |
| FCF yield | 3.64% | 5.85%● |
Profitability
| Metric | IR | OTIS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.24%● | 30.39% |
| Operating margin | 18.06%● | 15.44% |
| Net margin | 7.54% | 10.11%● |
| ROE | 5.77%● | -25.67% |
| ROIC | 6.34% | 39.59%● |
Dividends
| Metric | IR | OTIS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | 2.40%● |
| Payout ratio | 5.48% | 49.86% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | IR | OTIS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.25%● | 2.11% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.01% | 11.05% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.93%● | -0.59% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.80%● | -0.59% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, IR or OTIS?
- It depends on your goal. value: OTIS (lower P/E); growth: IR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: OTIS (higher dividend yield); quality: OTIS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, OTIS leads 9 to 6.
- Is IR or OTIS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, OTIS is cheaper: IR trades at a 54.98 P/E and OTIS at 19.47.
- Which has grown faster, IR or OTIS?
- Over the past five years, IR grew revenue faster — IR at a 10.25% CAGR versus OTIS at 2.11%.
- Does IR or OTIS pay a bigger dividend?
- IR yields 0.10% and OTIS yields 2.40% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is IR or OTIS more profitable?
- OTIS runs the higher net margin — IR at 7.54% versus OTIS at 10.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, IR or OTIS?
- Over the past 5-year, IR delivered the higher annualized total return — IR at 10.80% versus OTIS at -0.59%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ingersoll Rand P/E ratioOtis Worldwide P/E ratioIngersoll Rand dividend yieldOtis Worldwide dividend yieldIngersoll Rand ROEOtis Worldwide ROEIngersoll Rand operating marginOtis Worldwide operating marginIngersoll Rand revenue growthOtis Worldwide revenue growthIngersoll Rand free cash flowOtis Worldwide free cash flow
Ingersoll Rand & Otis Worldwide appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.