Which has the lower trailing P/E, IR or NVT?

IR has the lower trailing P/E: IR trades at 31.31 and NVT at 45.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, IR or NVT?

Over the past five years, NVT grew revenue faster — IR at a 9.56% CAGR versus NVT at 17.26%.

Does IR or NVT pay a bigger dividend?

IR yields 0.11% and NVT yields 0.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is IR or NVT more profitable?

NVT runs the higher net margin — IR at 12.08% versus NVT at 12.34%.

How have IR and NVT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, IR delivered 6.03% and NVT delivered 39.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) vs nVent Electric plc (NVT)

A side-by-side comparison of Ingersoll Rand Inc. and nVent Electric plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Ingersoll Rand Inc.

$29.77B

$76.08IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NVT

nVent Electric plc

$26.59B

$164.41IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — IR vs NVT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

IR +170.0% (+13.2%/yr)NVT +650.5% (+28.7%/yr)NVT compounded faster over this window

IR NVT

IR vs NVT: by the numbers

•IR is the larger company ($29.77B vs $26.59B market cap).
•IR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.31 vs 45.04 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NVT converts more revenue to profit (12.34% vs 12.08% net margin).
•NVT grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.26% vs 9.56% CAGR).
•NVT pays the higher dividend yield (0.51% vs 0.11%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IR	NVT
P/E ratio	31.31	45.04
Forward P/E	21.47	32.00
P/S ratio	3.75	5.50
P/B ratio	2.93	6.67
EV / EBITDA	15.10	26.27
FCF yield	4.10%	2.17%

Profitability

Metric	IR	NVT
Gross margin	37.94%	36.97%
Operating margin	21.52%	17.22%
Net margin	12.08%	12.34%
ROE	9.42%	14.96%
ROIC	8.36%	10.66%

Dividends

Metric	IR	NVT
Dividend yield	0.11%	0.51%
Payout ratio	3.29%	22.74%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IR	NVT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.56%	17.26%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.01%	22.34%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.43%	10.16%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.03%	39.37%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, IR or NVT?: IR has the lower trailing P/E: IR trades at 31.31 and NVT at 45.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, IR or NVT?: Over the past five years, NVT grew revenue faster — IR at a 9.56% CAGR versus NVT at 17.26%.
Does IR or NVT pay a bigger dividend?: IR yields 0.11% and NVT yields 0.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is IR or NVT more profitable?: NVT runs the higher net margin — IR at 12.08% versus NVT at 12.34%.
How have IR and NVT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, IR delivered 6.03% and NVT delivered 39.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IR analysis Full NVT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ingersoll R P/E ratio nVent Electric P/E ratio Ingersoll R dividend yield nVent Electric dividend yield Ingersoll R ROE nVent Electric ROE Ingersoll R operating margin nVent Electric operating margin Ingersoll R revenue growth nVent Electric revenue growth Ingersoll R free cash flow nVent Electric free cash flow

Ingersoll R & nVent Electric appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.