Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) vs Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR)
A side-by-side comparison of Invitation Homes Inc. and Lamar Advertising Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — INVH vs LAMR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yINVH vs LAMR: by the numbers
- •INVH is the larger company ($15.68B vs $14.69B market cap).
- •LAMR converts more revenue to profit (23.90% vs 23.14% net margin).
- •INVH grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.60% vs 7.37% CAGR).
- •LAMR pays the higher dividend yield (4.62% vs 4.57%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | INVH | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.21 | 26.41 |
| Forward P/E | 26.23 | 24.46 |
| PEG ratio | 1.08 | 1.38 |
| P/S ratio | 5.49 | 6.31 |
| P/B ratio | 1.73 | 14.75 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.84 | 19.85 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 5.14% |
For REITs like Invitation Homes Inc., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
For REITs like Lamar Advertising Company, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | INVH | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 3.69% | 40.67% |
| Operating margin | 30.16% | 27.97% |
| Net margin | 23.14% | 23.90% |
| ROE | 7.30% | 55.86% |
| ROIC | 4.67% | 9.56% |
Dividends
| Metric | INVH | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.57% | 4.62% |
| Payout ratio | 109.17% | 121.35% |
Invitation Homes Inc.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Lamar Advertising Company's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | INVH | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.60% | 7.37% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 22.36% | 19.12% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 5.51% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -4.23% | 9.88% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, INVH or LAMR?
- Over the past five years, INVH grew revenue faster — INVH at a 8.60% CAGR versus LAMR at 7.37%.
- Does INVH or LAMR pay a bigger dividend?
- INVH yields 4.57% and LAMR yields 4.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is INVH or LAMR more profitable?
- LAMR runs the higher net margin — INVH at 23.14% versus LAMR at 23.90%.
- How have INVH and LAMR total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, INVH delivered -4.23% and LAMR delivered 9.88% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Invitation Homes & Lamar Advertising appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.