Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) vs Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM)

A side-by-side comparison of Invitation Homes Inc. and Kimco Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnINVH vs KIM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
INVH +91.3% (+6.7%/yr)KIM +56.0% (+4.5%/yr)INVH compounded faster over this window
50100150200250Start $1002019202120232025$191$156
INVH KIM

INVH vs KIM: by the numbers

  • INVH is the larger company ($17.70B vs $16.15B market cap).
  • KIM converts more revenue to profit (27.73% vs 23.14% net margin).
  • KIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.73% vs 8.60% CAGR).
  • KIM pays the higher dividend yield (4.27% vs 3.98%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricINVHKIM
P/E ratio27.4227.09
Forward P/E36.7329.08
P/S ratio6.207.41
P/B ratio1.961.58
EV / EBITDA16.0917.31
FCF yield6.11%5.29%

For REITs like Invitation Homes Inc., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

For REITs like Kimco Realty Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

Profitability

MetricINVHKIM
Gross margin3.69%54.85%
Operating margin30.16%35.80%
Net margin23.14%27.73%
ROE7.30%5.91%
ROIC4.91%4.26%

Dividends

MetricINVHKIM
Dividend yield3.98%4.27%
Payout ratio123.96%124.10%

Invitation Homes Inc.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Kimco Realty Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Growth (annualized)

MetricINVHKIM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)8.60%14.73%
EPS CAGR (5Y)22.36%-18.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)12.11%5.82%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-2.03%6.66%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, INVH or KIM?
Over the past five years, KIM grew revenue faster — INVH at a 8.60% CAGR versus KIM at 14.73%.
Does INVH or KIM pay a bigger dividend?
INVH yields 3.98% and KIM yields 4.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is INVH or KIM more profitable?
KIM runs the higher net margin — INVH at 23.14% versus KIM at 27.73%.
How have INVH and KIM total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, INVH delivered -2.03% and KIM delivered 2.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 11, 2026.