Which has the lower trailing P/E, INTU or MSI?

INTU has the lower trailing P/E: INTU trades at 19.50 and MSI at 36.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, INTU or MSI?

Over the past five years, INTU grew revenue faster — INTU at a 17.36% CAGR versus MSI at 9.18%.

Does INTU or MSI pay a bigger dividend?

INTU yields 1.53% and MSI yields 1.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is INTU or MSI more profitable?

INTU runs the higher net margin — INTU at 21.29% versus MSI at 17.44%.

How have INTU and MSI total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, INTU delivered 11.97% and MSI delivered 21.53% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI)

A side-by-side comparison of Intuit Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

INTU

Intuit Inc.

$87.96B

$321.57TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MSI

Motorola Solutions, Inc.

$77.38B

$466.16TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — INTU vs MSI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

INTU +205.1% (+11.8%/yr)MSI +608.9% (+21.6%/yr)MSI compounded faster over this window

INTU MSI

INTU vs MSI: by the numbers

•INTU is the larger company ($87.96B vs $77.38B market cap).
•INTU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.50 vs 36.71 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•INTU converts more revenue to profit (21.29% vs 17.44% net margin).
•INTU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.36% vs 9.18% CAGR).
•INTU pays the higher dividend yield (1.53% vs 1.02%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	INTU	MSI
P/E ratio	19.50	36.71
Forward P/E	13.38	26.34
P/S ratio	4.10	6.32
P/B ratio	4.63	28.96
EV / EBITDA	13.61	23.62
FCF yield	9.80%	3.46%

Profitability

Metric	INTU	MSI
Gross margin	81.28%	49.97%
Operating margin	27.43%	25.05%
Net margin	21.29%	17.44%
ROE	24.04%	79.87%
ROIC	16.02%	16.59%

Dividends

Metric	INTU	MSI
Dividend yield	1.53%	1.02%
Payout ratio	29.11%	37.17%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	INTU	MSI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.36%	9.18%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.69%	18.30%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	22.49%	10.51%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-10.57%	15.19%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, INTU or MSI?: INTU has the lower trailing P/E: INTU trades at 19.50 and MSI at 36.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, INTU or MSI?: Over the past five years, INTU grew revenue faster — INTU at a 17.36% CAGR versus MSI at 9.18%.
Does INTU or MSI pay a bigger dividend?: INTU yields 1.53% and MSI yields 1.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is INTU or MSI more profitable?: INTU runs the higher net margin — INTU at 21.29% versus MSI at 17.44%.
How have INTU and MSI total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, INTU delivered 11.97% and MSI delivered 21.53% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full INTU analysis Full MSI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Intuit P/E ratio Motorola Solutions P/E ratio Intuit dividend yield Motorola Solutions dividend yield Intuit ROE Motorola Solutions ROE Intuit operating margin Motorola Solutions operating margin Intuit revenue growth Motorola Solutions revenue growth Intuit free cash flow Motorola Solutions free cash flow

Intuit & Motorola Solutions appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.