Which has the lower trailing P/E, IIIV or SLP?

IIIV has the lower trailing P/E: IIIV trades at 42.91 and SLP at 46.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, IIIV or SLP?

Over the past five years, SLP grew revenue faster — IIIV at a 2.25% CAGR versus SLP at 12.19%.

Is IIIV or SLP more profitable?

SLP runs the higher net margin — IIIV at 4.90% versus SLP at 9.88%.

How have IIIV and SLP total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, IIIV delivered -9.61% and SLP delivered -13.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) vs Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP)

A side-by-side comparison of i3 Verticals, Inc. and Simulations Plus, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

IIIV

i3 Verticals, Inc.

$357M

$14.96TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SLP

Simulations Plus, Inc.

$374M

$18.50TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — IIIV vs SLP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

IIIV -18.4% (-2.5%/yr)SLP -6.5% (-0.8%/yr)SLP compounded faster over this window

IIIV SLP

IIIV vs SLP: by the numbers

•SLP is the larger company ($374M vs $357M market cap).
•IIIV trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (42.91 vs 46.30 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SLP converts more revenue to profit (9.88% vs 4.90% net margin).
•SLP grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.19% vs 2.25% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IIIV	SLP
P/E ratio	42.91	46.30
Forward P/E	12.26	20.33
P/S ratio	1.64	4.56
P/B ratio	1.27	2.69
EV / EBITDA	13.79	19.70
FCF yield	13.97%	6.54%

Profitability

Metric	IIIV	SLP
Gross margin	55.67%	63.38%
Operating margin	2.46%	-89.33%
Net margin	4.90%	9.88%
ROE	3.81%	5.83%
ROIC	0.66%	5.33%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IIIV	SLP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.25%	12.19%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-26.73%	15.79%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-9.61%	-13.86%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, IIIV or SLP?: IIIV has the lower trailing P/E: IIIV trades at 42.91 and SLP at 46.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, IIIV or SLP?: Over the past five years, SLP grew revenue faster — IIIV at a 2.25% CAGR versus SLP at 12.19%.
Is IIIV or SLP more profitable?: SLP runs the higher net margin — IIIV at 4.90% versus SLP at 9.88%.
How have IIIV and SLP total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, IIIV delivered -9.61% and SLP delivered -13.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IIIV analysis Full SLP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

i3 Verticals P/E ratio Simulations Plus P/E ratio i3 Verticals ROE Simulations Plus ROE i3 Verticals operating margin Simulations Plus operating margin i3 Verticals revenue growth Simulations Plus revenue growth i3 Verticals free cash flow Simulations Plus free cash flow

i3 Verticals & Simulations Plus appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.