Information Services Group, Inc. (III) vs Outdoor Holding Company (POWW)
A side-by-side comparison of Information Services Group, Inc. and Outdoor Holding Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
III
Information Services Group, Inc.
$5.71IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
POWW
Outdoor Holding Company
$2.16IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — III vs POWW
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yIII +123.0% (+8.4%/yr)POWW -42.6% (-5.4%/yr)III compounded faster over this window
III POWW
III vs POWW: by the numbers
- •III is the larger company ($273M vs $251M market cap).
- •III trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.14 vs 86.75 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •POWW converts more revenue to profit (10.66% vs 4.67% net margin).
- •Both shrank revenue over the past five years; III's decline was smaller (-1.15% vs -11.53% CAGR).
- •III pays a dividend (3.09% yield), while POWW has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | III | POWW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.14 | 86.75 |
| Forward P/E | 23.79 | 43.20 |
| PEG ratio | 0.93 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 1.09 | 4.67 |
| P/B ratio | 2.85 | 1.06 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.44 | 10.64 |
| FCF yield | 3.54% | 4.54% |
Profitability
| Metric | III | POWW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 42.15% | 59.08% |
| Operating margin | 8.43% | -1.60% |
| Net margin | 4.67% | 10.66% |
| ROE | 12.19% | 2.43% |
| ROIC | 7.89% | 1.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | III | POWW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.09% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 76.11% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | III | POWW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.15% | -11.53% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.93% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -23.22% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.86% | -18.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, III or POWW?
- III has the lower trailing P/E: III trades at 24.14 and POWW at 86.75. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, III or POWW?
- Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with III's decline the smaller — III at a -1.15% CAGR versus POWW at -11.53%.
- Does III or POWW pay a bigger dividend?
- III pays a dividend (3.09% yield), while POWW has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is III or POWW more profitable?
- POWW runs the higher net margin — III at 4.67% versus POWW at 10.66%.
- How have III and POWW total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, III delivered -0.86% and POWW delivered -18.21% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Information Services P/E ratioOutdoor P/E ratioInformation Services dividend yieldInformation Services ROEOutdoor ROEInformation Services operating marginOutdoor operating marginInformation Services revenue growthOutdoor revenue growthInformation Services free cash flowOutdoor free cash flow
Information Services & Outdoor appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.