International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) vs Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM)
A side-by-side comparison of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
$86.33Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
$79.01Basic MaterialsAt close: Aug 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — IFF vs SQM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yIFF -18.2% (-2.0%/yr)SQM +345.3% (+16.1%/yr)SQM compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
IFF SQM
IFF vs SQM: by the numbers
- •SQM is the larger company ($22.57B vs $22.04B market cap).
- •SQM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.26 vs 79.94 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •SQM converts more revenue to profit (20.61% vs 2.91% net margin).
- •SQM grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.46% vs 4.28% CAGR).
- •IFF pays the higher dividend yield (1.85% vs 1.29%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | IFF | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 79.94 | 16.26 |
| Forward P/E | 25.20 | 11.59 |
| P/S ratio | 2.22 | 3.35 |
| P/B ratio | 1.59 | 3.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.16 | 8.29 |
| FCF yield | 2.42% | 8.62% |
Profitability
| Metric | IFF | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.52% | 29.32% |
| Operating margin | 7.78% | 24.83% |
| Net margin | 2.91% | 20.61% |
| ROE | 2.07% | 22.09% |
| ROIC | 2.80% | 11.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | IFF | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 1.29% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 49.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | IFF | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.28% | 26.46% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -25.13% | 27.15% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -10.39% | 27.23% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.21% | 13.19% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, IFF or SQM?
- SQM has the lower trailing P/E: IFF trades at 79.94 and SQM at 16.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, IFF or SQM?
- Over the past five years, SQM grew revenue faster — IFF at a 4.28% CAGR versus SQM at 26.46%.
- Does IFF or SQM pay a bigger dividend?
- IFF yields 1.85% and SQM yields 1.29% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is IFF or SQM more profitable?
- SQM runs the higher net margin — IFF at 2.91% versus SQM at 20.61%.
- How have IFF and SQM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, IFF delivered -2.26% and SQM delivered 16.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
International Flavors & Fragrances P/E ratioSociedad Química y Minera de Chile P/E ratioInternational Flavors & Fragrances dividend yieldSociedad Química y Minera de Chile dividend yieldInternational Flavors & Fragrances ROESociedad Química y Minera de Chile ROEInternational Flavors & Fragrances operating marginSociedad Química y Minera de Chile operating marginInternational Flavors & Fragrances revenue growthSociedad Química y Minera de Chile revenue growthInternational Flavors & Fragrances free cash flowSociedad Química y Minera de Chile free cash flow
International Flavors & Fragrances & Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 31, 2026.