Which has the lower trailing P/E, IFF or RS?

RS has the lower trailing P/E: IFF trades at 77.64 and RS at 24.64. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, IFF or RS?

Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — IFF at a 4.28% CAGR versus RS at 8.57%.

Does IFF or RS pay a bigger dividend?

IFF yields 1.91% and RS yields 1.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is IFF or RS more profitable?

RS runs the higher net margin — IFF at 2.91% versus RS at 5.66%.

How have IFF and RS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, IFF delivered -2.33% and RS delivered 21.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) vs Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS)

A side-by-side comparison of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

IFF

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.

$21.41B

$83.85Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

$21.81B

$427.11Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — IFF vs RS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

IFF -19.8% (-2.2%/yr)RS +601.0% (+21.5%/yr)RS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

IFF RS

IFF vs RS: by the numbers

•RS is the larger company ($21.81B vs $21.41B market cap).
•RS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.64 vs 77.64 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RS converts more revenue to profit (5.66% vs 2.91% net margin).
•RS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.57% vs 4.28% CAGR).
•IFF pays the higher dividend yield (1.91% vs 1.16%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IFF	RS
P/E ratio	77.64	24.64
Forward P/E	23.47	18.37
P/S ratio	2.16	1.38
P/B ratio	1.54	2.96
EV / EBITDA	15.79	15.51
FCF yield	2.50%	2.47%

Profitability

Metric	IFF	RS
Gross margin	37.52%	26.89%
Operating margin	7.78%	7.88%
Net margin	2.91%	5.66%
ROE	2.07%	12.09%
ROIC	3.19%	8.16%

Dividends

Metric	IFF	RS
Dividend yield	1.91%	1.16%
Payout ratio	N/A	34.83%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IFF	RS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.28%	8.57%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-25.13%	19.64%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-10.32%	-1.79%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-9.29%	23.47%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, IFF or RS?: RS has the lower trailing P/E: IFF trades at 77.64 and RS at 24.64. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, IFF or RS?: Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — IFF at a 4.28% CAGR versus RS at 8.57%.
Does IFF or RS pay a bigger dividend?: IFF yields 1.91% and RS yields 1.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is IFF or RS more profitable?: RS runs the higher net margin — IFF at 2.91% versus RS at 5.66%.
How have IFF and RS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, IFF delivered -2.33% and RS delivered 21.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IFF analysis Full RS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

International Flavors & Fragrances P/E ratio Reliance Steel & Aluminum P/E ratio International Flavors & Fragrances dividend yield Reliance Steel & Aluminum dividend yield International Flavors & Fragrances ROE Reliance Steel & Aluminum ROE International Flavors & Fragrances operating margin Reliance Steel & Aluminum operating margin International Flavors & Fragrances revenue growth Reliance Steel & Aluminum revenue growth International Flavors & Fragrances free cash flow Reliance Steel & Aluminum free cash flow

International Flavors & Fragrances & Reliance Steel & Aluminum appear in these rankings

Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 13, 2026.