International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) vs Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS)
IFF leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
$76.35Basic Materials
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
$385.78Basic Materials
Total return — IFF vs RS
growth of $100 · last 30yIFF +61.6%RS +4559.2%RS compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
IFF RS
IFF vs RS: by the numbers
- •RS is the larger company ($19.69B vs $19.49B market cap).
- •IFF trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.35 vs 25.18 P/E).
- •IFF converts more revenue to profit (7.90% vs 5.43% net margin).
- •IFF grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.71% vs 10.33% CAGR).
- •IFF pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 1.30%).
Which is better, IFF or RS?
Metric tally: IFF 9 · RS 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueIFF(lower P/E)
GrowthIFF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeIFF(higher dividend yield)
QualityRS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | IFF | RS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.35● | 25.18 |
| Forward P/E | 17.22● | 17.95 |
| P/S ratio | 1.82 | 1.35● |
| P/B ratio | 1.39● | 2.81 |
| PEG ratio | 0.18● | 1.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.91● | 15.65 |
| FCF yield | 2.03% | 3.05%● |
Profitability
| Metric | IFF | RS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.35%● | 27.22% |
| Operating margin | 7.56% | 7.52% |
| Net margin | 7.90%● | 5.43% |
| ROE | 6.03% | 11.32%● |
| ROIC | 3.19% | 8.16%● |
Dividends
| Metric | IFF | RS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.10%● | 1.30% |
| Payout ratio | — | 35.54% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | IFF | RS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.71%● | 10.33% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -25.13% | 19.64%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.45% | -9.42%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -10.13% | 22.21%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, IFF or RS?
- It depends on your goal. value: IFF (lower P/E); growth: IFF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: IFF (higher dividend yield); quality: RS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, IFF leads 9 to 7.
- Is IFF or RS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, IFF is cheaper: IFF trades at a 23.35 P/E and RS at 25.18.
- Which has grown faster, IFF or RS?
- Over the past five years, IFF grew revenue faster — IFF at a 11.71% CAGR versus RS at 10.33%.
- Does IFF or RS pay a bigger dividend?
- IFF yields 2.10% and RS yields 1.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is IFF or RS more profitable?
- IFF runs the higher net margin — IFF at 7.90% versus RS at 5.43%.
- Which has been the better investment, IFF or RS?
- Over the past 10-year, RS delivered the higher annualized total return — IFF at -2.23% versus RS at 20.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
International Flavors & Fragrances P/E ratioReliance Steel & Aluminum P/E ratioInternational Flavors & Fragrances dividend yieldReliance Steel & Aluminum dividend yieldInternational Flavors & Fragrances ROEReliance Steel & Aluminum ROEInternational Flavors & Fragrances operating marginReliance Steel & Aluminum operating marginInternational Flavors & Fragrances revenue growthReliance Steel & Aluminum revenue growthInternational Flavors & Fragrances free cash flowReliance Steel & Aluminum free cash flow
International Flavors & Fragrances & Reliance Steel & Aluminum appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.