International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) vs Nutrien Ltd. (NTR)
NTR leads on 15 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. and Nutrien Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
$77.85Basic Materials
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
$65.48Basic Materials
Total return — IFF vs NTR
growth of $100 · last 8yIFF -49.0%NTR +19.6%NTR compounded faster
IFF NTR
IFF vs NTR: by the numbers
- •NTR is the larger company ($31.51B vs $19.88B market cap).
- •NTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.34 vs 23.81 P/E).
- •NTR converts more revenue to profit (8.58% vs 7.90% net margin).
- •IFF grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.71% vs 5.38% CAGR).
- •NTR pays the higher dividend yield (3.34% vs 2.06%).
Which is better, IFF or NTR?
Metric tally: IFF 2 · NTR 15It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNTR(lower P/E)
GrowthIFF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNTR(higher dividend yield)
QualityNTR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | IFF | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.81 | 13.34● |
| Forward P/E | 17.55 | 12.40● |
| P/S ratio | 1.85 | 1.13● |
| P/B ratio | 1.42 | 1.25● |
| PEG ratio | 0.19 | 0.05● |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.66 | 7.09● |
| FCF yield | 1.99% | 7.07%● |
Profitability
| Metric | IFF | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.35%● | 31.16% |
| Operating margin | 7.56% | 14.15%● |
| Net margin | 7.90% | 8.58%● |
| ROE | 6.03% | 9.46%● |
| ROIC | 3.19% | 6.79%● |
Dividends
| Metric | IFF | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 3.34%● |
| Payout ratio | — | 46.10% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | IFF | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.71%● | 5.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -25.13% | 41.02%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.45% | 0.42%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.58% | 4.60%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, IFF or NTR?
- It depends on your goal. value: NTR (lower P/E); growth: IFF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTR (higher dividend yield); quality: NTR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTR leads 15 to 2.
- Is IFF or NTR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: IFF trades at a 23.81 P/E and NTR at 13.34.
- Which has grown faster, IFF or NTR?
- Over the past five years, IFF grew revenue faster — IFF at a 11.71% CAGR versus NTR at 5.38%.
- Does IFF or NTR pay a bigger dividend?
- IFF yields 2.06% and NTR yields 3.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is IFF or NTR more profitable?
- NTR runs the higher net margin — IFF at 7.90% versus NTR at 8.58%.
- Which has been the better investment, IFF or NTR?
- Over the past 5-year, NTR delivered the higher annualized total return — IFF at -2.35% versus NTR at 4.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
International Flavors & Fragrances P/E ratioNutrien P/E ratioInternational Flavors & Fragrances dividend yieldNutrien dividend yieldInternational Flavors & Fragrances ROENutrien ROEInternational Flavors & Fragrances operating marginNutrien operating marginInternational Flavors & Fragrances revenue growthNutrien revenue growthInternational Flavors & Fragrances free cash flowNutrien free cash flow
International Flavors & Fragrances & Nutrien appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.