International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) vs Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM)
MLM leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
$76.72Basic Materials
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
$609.12Basic Materials
Total return — IFF vs MLM
growth of $100 · last 30yIFF +54.2%MLM +2438.0%MLM compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
IFF MLM
IFF vs MLM: by the numbers
- •MLM is the larger company ($36.58B vs $19.59B market cap).
- •MLM trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.52 vs 23.46 P/E).
- •MLM converts more revenue to profit (38.67% vs 7.90% net margin).
- •IFF grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.71% vs 6.63% CAGR).
- •IFF pays the higher dividend yield (2.09% vs 0.55%).
Which is better, IFF or MLM?
Metric tally: IFF 8 · MLM 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMLM(lower P/E)
GrowthIFF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeIFF(higher dividend yield)
QualityMLM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | IFF | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.46 | 14.52● |
| Forward P/E | 17.29● | 26.78 |
| P/S ratio | 1.83● | 5.61 |
| P/B ratio | 1.40● | 3.26 |
| PEG ratio | 0.19● | 1.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.52● | 19.76 |
| FCF yield | 2.02% | 2.81%● |
Profitability
| Metric | IFF | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.35%● | 29.56% |
| Operating margin | 7.56% | 22.74%● |
| Net margin | 7.90% | 38.67%● |
| ROE | 6.03% | 22.43%● |
| ROIC | 3.19% | 6.87%● |
Dividends
| Metric | IFF | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.09%● | 0.55% |
| Payout ratio | — | 17.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | IFF | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.71%● | 6.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -25.13% | 10.27%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.45% | 6.09%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.46% | 13.38%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, IFF or MLM?
- It depends on your goal. value: MLM (lower P/E); growth: IFF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: IFF (higher dividend yield); quality: MLM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MLM leads 9 to 8.
- Is IFF or MLM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MLM is cheaper: IFF trades at a 23.46 P/E and MLM at 14.52.
- Which has grown faster, IFF or MLM?
- Over the past five years, IFF grew revenue faster — IFF at a 11.71% CAGR versus MLM at 6.63%.
- Does IFF or MLM pay a bigger dividend?
- IFF yields 2.09% and MLM yields 0.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is IFF or MLM more profitable?
- MLM runs the higher net margin — IFF at 7.90% versus MLM at 38.67%.
- Which has been the better investment, IFF or MLM?
- Over the past 10-year, MLM delivered the higher annualized total return — IFF at -2.40% versus MLM at 13.64%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
International Flavors & Fragrances P/E ratioMartin Marietta Materials P/E ratioInternational Flavors & Fragrances dividend yieldMartin Marietta Materials dividend yieldInternational Flavors & Fragrances ROEMartin Marietta Materials ROEInternational Flavors & Fragrances operating marginMartin Marietta Materials operating marginInternational Flavors & Fragrances revenue growthMartin Marietta Materials revenue growthInternational Flavors & Fragrances free cash flowMartin Marietta Materials free cash flow
International Flavors & Fragrances & Martin Marietta Materials appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.