Which has the lower trailing P/E, IDCC or SIMO?

SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: IDCC trades at 37.43 and SIMO at 7.06. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, IDCC or SIMO?

Over the past five years, IDCC grew revenue faster — IDCC at a 17.75% CAGR versus SIMO at 14.30%.

Does IDCC or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?

IDCC yields 0.80% and SIMO yields 0.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is IDCC or SIMO more profitable?

IDCC runs the higher net margin — IDCC at 38.32% versus SIMO at 22.06%.

How have IDCC and SIMO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, IDCC delivered 19.53% and SIMO delivered 21.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

A side-by-side comparison of InterDigital, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

IDCC

InterDigital, Inc.

$8.37B

$324.49TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 10:49 AM EDT

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$8.09B

$241.05TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 10:49 AM EDT

Total return — IDCC vs SIMO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

IDCC +481.8% (+19.3%/yr)SIMO +604.7% (+21.6%/yr)SIMO compounded faster over this window

IDCC SIMO

IDCC vs SIMO: by the numbers

•IDCC is the larger company ($8.37B vs $8.09B market cap).
•SIMO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (7.06 vs 37.43 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•IDCC converts more revenue to profit (38.32% vs 22.06% net margin).
•IDCC grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.75% vs 14.30% CAGR).
•IDCC pays the higher dividend yield (0.80% vs 0.70%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IDCC	SIMO
P/E ratio	37.43	7.06
Forward P/E	35.77	21.54
P/S ratio	10.62	6.16
P/B ratio	6.97	7.73
EV / EBITDA	19.29	32.55
FCF yield	6.15%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	IDCC	SIMO
Gross margin	78.66%	48.87%
Operating margin	55.26%	16.31%
Net margin	38.32%	22.06%
ROE	25.14%	27.68%
ROIC	16.87%	14.77%

Dividends

Metric	IDCC	SIMO
Dividend yield	0.80%	0.70%
Payout ratio	32.30%	5.85%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IDCC	SIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.75%	14.30%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	60.96%	44.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	70.47%	-42.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	40.58%	32.95%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, IDCC or SIMO?: SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: IDCC trades at 37.43 and SIMO at 7.06. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, IDCC or SIMO?: Over the past five years, IDCC grew revenue faster — IDCC at a 17.75% CAGR versus SIMO at 14.30%.
Does IDCC or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?: IDCC yields 0.80% and SIMO yields 0.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is IDCC or SIMO more profitable?: IDCC runs the higher net margin — IDCC at 38.32% versus SIMO at 22.06%.
How have IDCC and SIMO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, IDCC delivered 19.53% and SIMO delivered 21.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IDCC analysis Full SIMO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

InterDigital P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio InterDigital dividend yield Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield InterDigital ROE Silicon Motion Technology ROE InterDigital operating margin Silicon Motion Technology operating margin InterDigital revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth InterDigital free cash flow Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow

InterDigital & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.