Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) vs Truist Financial Corporation (TFC)
ICE leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though TFC is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and Truist Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
$140.10Financial Services
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
$51.66Financial Services
Total return — ICE vs TFC
growth of $100 · last 21yICE +1684.7%TFC +20.1%ICE compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ICE TFC
ICE vs TFC: by the numbers
- •ICE is the larger company ($79.23B vs $63.42B market cap).
- •TFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.28 vs 20.39 P/E).
- •ICE converts more revenue to profit (29.98% vs 18.14% net margin).
- •ICE grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.85% vs 5.16% CAGR).
- •TFC pays the higher dividend yield (4.03% vs 1.43%).
Which is better, ICE or TFC?
Metric tally: ICE 8 · TFC 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTFC(lower P/E)
GrowthICE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTFC(higher dividend yield)
QualityICE(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ICE | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.39 | 13.28● |
| Forward P/E | 15.89 | 11.37● |
| P/S ratio | 6.11 | 2.15● |
| P/B ratio | 2.70 | 1.02● |
| PEG ratio | 1.34 | 0.79● |
Profitability
| Metric | ICE | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.98%● | 62.92% |
| Operating margin | 40.84%● | 21.35% |
| Net margin | 29.98%● | 18.14% |
| ROE | 13.26%● | 8.61% |
| ROIC | 7.03%● | 3.61% |
Dividends
| Metric | ICE | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 4.03%● |
| Payout ratio | 34.48% | 53.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ICE | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.85%● | 5.16% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.88%● | 4.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.57%● | 2.52% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ICE or TFC?
- It depends on your goal. value: TFC (lower P/E); growth: ICE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TFC (higher dividend yield); quality: ICE (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ICE leads 8 to 6.
- Is ICE or TFC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TFC is cheaper: ICE trades at a 20.39 P/E and TFC at 13.28.
- Which has grown faster, ICE or TFC?
- Over the past five years, ICE grew revenue faster — ICE at a 8.85% CAGR versus TFC at 5.16%.
- Does ICE or TFC pay a bigger dividend?
- ICE yields 1.43% and TFC yields 4.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ICE or TFC more profitable?
- ICE runs the higher net margin — ICE at 29.98% versus TFC at 18.14%.
- Which has been the better investment, ICE or TFC?
- Over the past 10-year, ICE delivered the higher annualized total return — ICE at 11.99% versus TFC at 7.96%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Intercontinental Exchange P/E ratioTruist Financial P/E ratioIntercontinental Exchange dividend yieldTruist Financial dividend yieldIntercontinental Exchange ROETruist Financial ROEIntercontinental Exchange operating marginTruist Financial operating marginIntercontinental Exchange revenue growthTruist Financial revenue growthIntercontinental Exchange free cash flowTruist Financial free cash flow
Intercontinental Exchange & Truist Financial appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.