Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)
A side-by-side comparison of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 1, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
$152.48Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$189.69Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — ICE vs MRSH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21yICE +2185.3%MRSH +949.3%ICE compounded faster
ICE MRSH
ICE vs MRSH: by the numbers
- •MRSH is the larger company ($90.52B vs $85.60B market cap).
- •ICE trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.54 vs 23.19 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ICE converts more revenue to profit (30.00% vs 14.24% net margin).
- •ICE grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.00% vs 8.62% CAGR).
- •MRSH pays the higher dividend yield (1.90% vs 1.31%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ICE | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.54 | 23.19 |
| Forward P/E | 18.99 | 18.16 |
| P/S ratio | 6.43 | 3.29 |
| P/B ratio | 2.92 | 6.05 |
| PEG ratio | 1.34 | 7.85 |
Profitability
| Metric | ICE | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.88% | 42.38% |
| Operating margin | 40.48% | 21.62% |
| Net margin | 30.00% | 14.24% |
| ROE | 13.61% | 26.21% |
| ROIC | 7.03% | 12.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | ICE | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.90% |
| Payout ratio | 34.48% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ICE | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.00% | 8.62% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.88% | 16.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.31% | 6.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ICE or MRSH?
- ICE has the lower trailing P/E: ICE trades at 21.54 and MRSH at 23.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ICE or MRSH?
- Over the past five years, ICE grew revenue faster — ICE at a 9.00% CAGR versus MRSH at 8.62%.
- Does ICE or MRSH pay a bigger dividend?
- ICE yields 1.31% and MRSH yields 1.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ICE or MRSH more profitable?
- ICE runs the higher net margin — ICE at 30.00% versus MRSH at 14.24%.
- How have ICE and MRSH total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ICE delivered 12.60% and MRSH delivered 13.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Intercontinental Exchange P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioIntercontinental Exchange dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldIntercontinental Exchange ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEIntercontinental Exchange operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginIntercontinental Exchange revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthIntercontinental Exchange free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Intercontinental Exchange & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 1, 2026.