Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM)
Over the past 10 years, ICE outperformed IWM — 12.11% vs 10.40% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and iShares Russell 2000 ETF across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — ICE vs IWM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMetrics side by side
Did ICE beat IWM?
Over the past 10 years, ICE outperformed IWM — 12.11% vs 10.40% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | ICE | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -8.38% | 22.97% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 12.03% | 17.43% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.95% | 6.68% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 12.11% | 10.40% |
IWM is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has ICE beaten IWM?
- Over the past 10 years, ICE outperformed IWM — 12.11% vs 10.40% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.