Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM)
Over the past 10 years, ICE outperformed IWM — 11.81% vs 11.12% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and iShares Russell 2000 ETF across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ICE vs IWM
growth of $100 · last 21yDid ICE beat IWM?
Over the past 10 years, ICE outperformed IWM — 11.81% vs 11.12% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | ICE | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -20.62% | 39.19%● |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 10.38% | 17.68%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.87% | 6.07%● |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 11.81%● | 11.12% |
IWM is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has ICE beaten IWM?
- Over the past 10 years, ICE outperformed IWM — 11.81% vs 11.12% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.