International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX)
IBM leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of International Business Machines Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
$272.24Technology
STX
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
$931.04Technology
Total return — IBM vs STX
growth of $100 · last 24yIBM +249.7%STX +7996.0%STX compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
IBM STX
IBM vs STX: by the numbers
- •IBM is the larger company ($255.87B vs $208.77B market cap).
- •IBM trades at the lower earnings multiple (24.07 vs 88.33 P/E).
- •STX converts more revenue to profit (21.60% vs 15.61% net margin).
- •STX grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.57% vs -0.09% CAGR).
- •IBM pays the higher dividend yield (2.47% vs 0.31%).
Which is better, IBM or STX?
Metric tally: IBM 9 · STX 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueIBM(lower P/E)
GrowthSTX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeIBM(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTX(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | IBM | STX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.07● | 88.33 |
| Forward P/E | 20.33● | 34.14 |
| P/S ratio | 3.76● | 19.36 |
| P/B ratio | 7.86● | 194.71 |
| PEG ratio | 0.35 | 0.06● |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.49● | 65.31 |
| FCF yield | 5.05%● | 1.23% |
Profitability
| Metric | IBM | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 58.97%● | 41.54% |
| Operating margin | 16.36% | 28.33%● |
| Net margin | 15.61% | 21.60%● |
| ROE | 32.61% | 217.17%● |
| ROIC | 8.57% | 34.14%● |
Dividends
| Metric | IBM | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.47%● | 0.31% |
| Payout ratio | 59.24% | 42.14% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | IBM | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.09% | 1.57%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.59%● | -0.47% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -3.35% | 20.22%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.04% | 61.98%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, IBM or STX?
- It depends on your goal. value: IBM (lower P/E); growth: STX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: IBM (higher dividend yield); quality: STX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, IBM leads 9 to 8.
- Is IBM or STX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, IBM is cheaper: IBM trades at a 24.07 P/E and STX at 88.33.
- Which has grown faster, IBM or STX?
- Over the past five years, STX grew revenue faster — IBM at a -0.09% CAGR versus STX at 1.57%.
- Does IBM or STX pay a bigger dividend?
- IBM yields 2.47% and STX yields 0.31% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is IBM or STX more profitable?
- STX runs the higher net margin — IBM at 15.61% versus STX at 21.60%.
- Which has been the better investment, IBM or STX?
- Over the past 10-year, STX delivered the higher annualized total return — IBM at 11.01% versus STX at 50.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
International Business Machines P/E ratioSeagate Technology P/E ratioInternational Business Machines dividend yieldSeagate Technology dividend yieldInternational Business Machines ROESeagate Technology ROEInternational Business Machines operating marginSeagate Technology operating marginInternational Business Machines revenue growthSeagate Technology revenue growthInternational Business Machines free cash flowSeagate Technology free cash flow
International Business Machines & Seagate Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.