Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)
WFC leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
$96.00Financial Services
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$82.20Financial Services
Total return — IBKR vs WFC
growth of $100 · last 19yIBKR +1126.1%WFC +129.4%IBKR compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
IBKR WFC
IBKR vs WFC: by the numbers
- •WFC is the larger company ($251.58B vs $165.11B market cap).
- •WFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.59 vs 41.38 P/E).
- •WFC converts more revenue to profit (17.29% vs 9.77% net margin).
- •IBKR grew revenue faster over the past five years (32.50% vs 9.46% CAGR).
- •WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.19% vs 0.34%).
Which is better, IBKR or WFC?
Metric tally: IBKR 6 · WFC 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWFC(lower P/E)
GrowthIBKR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWFC(higher dividend yield)
QualityIBKR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | IBKR | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 41.38 | 12.59● |
| Forward P/E | 38.21 | 11.73● |
| P/S ratio | 4.05 | 2.10● |
| P/B ratio | 7.71 | 1.48● |
| PEG ratio | 1.05 | 0.79● |
Profitability
| Metric | IBKR | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 91.74%● | 64.55% |
| Operating margin | 86.76%● | 20.47% |
| Net margin | 9.77% | 17.29%● |
| ROE | 18.59%● | 12.18% |
| ROIC | 17.47%● | 3.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | IBKR | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 2.19%● |
| Payout ratio | 14.69% | 28.17% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | IBKR | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 32.50%● | 9.46% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 29.60% | 72.38%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 44.21%● | 17.31% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, IBKR or WFC?
- It depends on your goal. value: WFC (lower P/E); growth: IBKR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WFC (higher dividend yield); quality: IBKR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WFC leads 8 to 6.
- Is IBKR or WFC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: IBKR trades at a 41.38 P/E and WFC at 12.59.
- Which has grown faster, IBKR or WFC?
- Over the past five years, IBKR grew revenue faster — IBKR at a 32.50% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
- Does IBKR or WFC pay a bigger dividend?
- IBKR yields 0.34% and WFC yields 2.19% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is IBKR or WFC more profitable?
- WFC runs the higher net margin — IBKR at 9.77% versus WFC at 17.29%.
- Which has been the better investment, IBKR or WFC?
- Over the past 10-year, IBKR delivered the higher annualized total return — IBKR at 27.41% versus WFC at 8.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Interactive Brokers P/E ratioWells Fargo & P/E ratioInteractive Brokers dividend yieldWells Fargo & dividend yieldInteractive Brokers ROEWells Fargo & ROEInteractive Brokers operating marginWells Fargo & operating marginInteractive Brokers revenue growthWells Fargo & revenue growthInteractive Brokers free cash flowWells Fargo & free cash flow
Interactive Brokers & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.