Which has grown faster, HYPOF or PCQ?

Over the past five years, HYPOF grew revenue faster — HYPOF at a 7.95% CAGR versus PCQ at 3.92%.

Does HYPOF or PCQ pay a bigger dividend?

PCQ pays a dividend (5.58% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is HYPOF or PCQ more profitable?

PCQ runs the higher net margin — HYPOF at 4.63% versus PCQ at 149.41%.

How have HYPOF and PCQ total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, HYPOF delivered -31.75% and PCQ delivered -12.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hypoport SE (HYPOF) vs PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund (PCQ)

A side-by-side comparison of Hypoport SE and PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HYPOF

Hypoport SE

$631M

$94.77Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 1, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PCQ

PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund

$436M

$7.76Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HYPOF vs PCQ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

HYPOF -64.1% (-13.6%/yr)PCQ -43.5% (-7.8%/yr)PCQ compounded faster over this window

HYPOF PCQ

HYPOF vs PCQ: by the numbers

•HYPOF is the larger company ($631M vs $436M market cap).
•PCQ converts more revenue to profit (149.41% vs 4.63% net margin).
•HYPOF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.95% vs 3.92% CAGR).
•PCQ pays a dividend (5.58% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HYPOF	PCQ
P/E ratio	18.99	N/A
P/S ratio	0.88	N/A
P/B ratio	1.44	0.77

Profitability

Metric	HYPOF	PCQ
Gross margin	15.50%	81.07%
Operating margin	4.49%	194.62%
Net margin	4.63%	149.41%
ROE	7.58%	5.88%

Dividends

Metric	HYPOF	PCQ
Dividend yield	N/A	5.58%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HYPOF	PCQ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.95%	3.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-2.99%	-7.79%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-31.75%	-12.17%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, HYPOF or PCQ?: Over the past five years, HYPOF grew revenue faster — HYPOF at a 7.95% CAGR versus PCQ at 3.92%.
Does HYPOF or PCQ pay a bigger dividend?: PCQ pays a dividend (5.58% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HYPOF or PCQ more profitable?: PCQ runs the higher net margin — HYPOF at 4.63% versus PCQ at 149.41%.
How have HYPOF and PCQ total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, HYPOF delivered -31.75% and PCQ delivered -12.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HYPOF analysis Full PCQ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hypoport SE P/E ratio PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund dividend yield Hypoport SE ROE PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund ROE Hypoport SE operating margin PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund operating margin Hypoport SE revenue growth PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund revenue growth

Hypoport SE & PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.