Which has grown faster, HYPOF or NMS?

Over the past five years, HYPOF grew revenue faster — HYPOF at a 7.95% CAGR versus NMS at -8.12%.

Does HYPOF or NMS pay a bigger dividend?

NMS pays a dividend (7.49% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is HYPOF or NMS more profitable?

NMS runs the higher net margin — HYPOF at 4.63% versus NMS at 130.68%.

How have HYPOF and NMS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, HYPOF delivered -31.75% and NMS delivered -2.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hypoport SE (HYPOF) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)

A side-by-side comparison of Hypoport SE and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HYPOF

Hypoport SE

$631M

$94.77Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NMS

Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund

$64M

$9.94Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — HYPOF vs NMS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

HYPOF -64.1% (-13.6%/yr)NMS +11.2% (+1.5%/yr)NMS compounded faster over this window

HYPOF NMS

HYPOF vs NMS: by the numbers

•HYPOF is the larger company ($631M vs $64M market cap).
•NMS converts more revenue to profit (130.68% vs 4.63% net margin).
•HYPOF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.95% vs -8.12% CAGR).
•NMS pays a dividend (7.49% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HYPOF	NMS
P/E ratio	18.99	N/A
P/S ratio	0.88	N/A
P/B ratio	1.44	0.84

Profitability

Metric	HYPOF	NMS
Gross margin	15.50%	85.04%
Operating margin	4.49%	162.66%
Net margin	4.63%	130.68%
ROE	7.58%	9.39%

Dividends

Metric	HYPOF	NMS
Dividend yield	N/A	7.49%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HYPOF	NMS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.95%	-8.12%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-2.99%	-3.96%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-31.75%	-2.81%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, HYPOF or NMS?: Over the past five years, HYPOF grew revenue faster — HYPOF at a 7.95% CAGR versus NMS at -8.12%.
Does HYPOF or NMS pay a bigger dividend?: NMS pays a dividend (7.49% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HYPOF or NMS more profitable?: NMS runs the higher net margin — HYPOF at 4.63% versus NMS at 130.68%.
How have HYPOF and NMS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, HYPOF delivered -31.75% and NMS delivered -2.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HYPOF analysis Full NMS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hypoport SE P/E ratio Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yield Hypoport SE ROE Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROE Hypoport SE operating margin Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating margin Hypoport SE revenue growth Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growth

Hypoport SE & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.