Hypoport SE (HYPOF) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
A side-by-side comparison of Hypoport SE and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
HYPOF
Hypoport SE
$94.77Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
$11.55Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — HYPOF vs NMS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yHYPOF -64.1% (-13.6%/yr)NMS +20.0% (+2.6%/yr)NMS compounded faster over this window
HYPOF NMS
HYPOF vs NMS: by the numbers
- •HYPOF is the larger company ($631M vs $74M market cap).
- •NMS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.79 vs 18.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NMS converts more revenue to profit (130.68% vs 4.63% net margin).
- •NMS grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.23% vs 7.95% CAGR).
- •NMS pays a dividend (6.91% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HYPOF | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.99 | 10.79 |
| Forward P/E | 21.29 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 0.87 | 9.54 |
| P/B ratio | 1.43 | 0.88 |
Profitability
| Metric | HYPOF | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 15.50% | 85.04% |
| Operating margin | 4.49% | 162.66% |
| Net margin | 4.63% | 130.68% |
| ROE | 7.58% | -0.33% |
| ROIC | 3.79% | 7.04% |
Dividends
| Metric | HYPOF | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 6.91% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HYPOF | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 9.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.99% | -22.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -31.75% | -0.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, HYPOF or NMS?
- NMS has the lower trailing P/E: HYPOF trades at 18.99 and NMS at 10.79. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, HYPOF or NMS?
- Over the past five years, NMS grew revenue faster — HYPOF at a 7.95% CAGR versus NMS at 9.23%.
- Does HYPOF or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
- NMS pays a dividend (6.91% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is HYPOF or NMS more profitable?
- NMS runs the higher net margin — HYPOF at 4.63% versus NMS at 130.68%.
- How have HYPOF and NMS total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, HYPOF delivered -31.75% and NMS delivered 0.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Hypoport SE P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldHypoport SE ROENuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEHypoport SE operating marginNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginHypoport SE revenue growthNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growth
Hypoport SE & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 13, 2026.