Hypoport SE (HYPOF) vs Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NKX)
Over the past 5 years, HYPOF lagged NKX — -31.75% vs -2.89% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Hypoport SE and Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — HYPOF vs NKX
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yMetrics side by side
Did HYPOF beat NKX?
Over the past 5 years, HYPOF lagged NKX — -31.75% vs -2.89% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | HYPOF | NKX |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -55.69% | -11.17% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | -14.14% | 7.98% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -31.75% | -2.89% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | N/A | 0.72% |
NKX is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has HYPOF beaten NKX?
- Over the past 5 years, HYPOF lagged NKX — -31.75% vs -2.89% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.