Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)
TT leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
$275.13Industrials
TT
Trane Technologies plc
$474.34Industrials
Total return — HWM vs TT
growth of $100 · last 30yHWM +1100.3%TT +4079.2%TT compounded faster
HWM TT
HWM vs TT: by the numbers
- •HWM is the larger company ($110.08B vs $104.86B market cap).
- •TT trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.69 vs 63.84 P/E).
- •HWM converts more revenue to profit (20.22% vs 13.42% net margin).
- •HWM grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.27% vs 10.98% CAGR).
- •TT pays the higher dividend yield (0.84% vs 0.17%).
Which is better, HWM or TT?
Metric tally: HWM 7 · TT 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTT(lower P/E)
GrowthHWM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTT(higher dividend yield)
QualityTT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HWM | TT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.84 | 36.69● |
| Forward P/E | 45.69 | 27.87● |
| P/S ratio | 12.86 | 4.90● |
| P/B ratio | 20.08 | 12.29● |
| PEG ratio | 1.73● | 2.06 |
| EV / EBITDA | 44.38 | 25.64● |
| FCF yield | 1.29% | 2.99%● |
Profitability
| Metric | HWM | TT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 32.56% | 35.92%● |
| Operating margin | 27.53%● | 18.17% |
| Net margin | 20.22%● | 13.42% |
| ROE | 31.58% | 33.65%● |
| ROIC | 18.19% | 20.26%● |
Dividends
| Metric | HWM | TT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 0.84%● |
| Payout ratio | 12.87% | 30.40% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HWM | TT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.27%● | 10.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 50.70%● | 29.75% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 103.64%● | 11.10% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 52.54%● | 22.96% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, HWM or TT?
- It depends on your goal. value: TT (lower P/E); growth: HWM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TT (higher dividend yield); quality: TT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TT leads 10 to 7.
- Is HWM or TT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TT is cheaper: HWM trades at a 63.84 P/E and TT at 36.69.
- Which has grown faster, HWM or TT?
- Over the past five years, HWM grew revenue faster — HWM at a 12.27% CAGR versus TT at 10.98%.
- Does HWM or TT pay a bigger dividend?
- HWM yields 0.17% and TT yields 0.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is HWM or TT more profitable?
- HWM runs the higher net margin — HWM at 20.22% versus TT at 13.42%.
- Which has been the better investment, HWM or TT?
- Over the past 10-year, HWM delivered the higher annualized total return — HWM at 29.39% versus TT at 26.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Howmet Aerospace P/E ratioTrane Technologies P/E ratioHowmet Aerospace dividend yieldTrane Technologies dividend yieldHowmet Aerospace ROETrane Technologies ROEHowmet Aerospace operating marginTrane Technologies operating marginHowmet Aerospace revenue growthTrane Technologies revenue growthHowmet Aerospace free cash flowTrane Technologies free cash flow
Howmet Aerospace & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.