Which has the lower trailing P/E, HWM or TT?

TT has the lower trailing P/E: HWM trades at 48.57 and TT at 33.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HWM or TT?

Over the past five years, HWM grew revenue faster — HWM at a 13.81% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.

Does HWM or TT pay a bigger dividend?

HWM yields 0.22% and TT yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is HWM or TT more profitable?

HWM runs the higher net margin — HWM at 20.52% versus TT at 13.28%.

How have HWM and TT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HWM delivered 27.71% and TT delivered 26.63% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

A side-by-side comparison of Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HWM

Howmet Aerospace Inc.

$90.17B

$225.36IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Trane Technologies plc

$96.33B

$437.82IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HWM vs TT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

HWM +1004.8% (+27.2%/yr)TT +956.2% (+26.6%/yr)HWM compounded faster over this window

HWM TT

HWM vs TT: by the numbers

•TT is the larger company ($96.33B vs $90.17B market cap).
•TT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.19 vs 48.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•HWM converts more revenue to profit (20.52% vs 13.28% net margin).
•HWM grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.81% vs 10.44% CAGR).
•TT pays the higher dividend yield (0.92% vs 0.22%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HWM	TT
P/E ratio	48.57	33.19
Forward P/E	42.24	28.66
P/S ratio	9.89	4.34
P/B ratio	15.73	11.14
EV / EBITDA	32.61	22.77
FCF yield	1.74%	3.73%

Profitability

Metric	HWM	TT
Gross margin	34.44%	35.39%
Operating margin	28.33%	17.94%
Net margin	20.52%	13.28%
ROE	32.64%	34.11%
ROIC	18.58%	19.89%

Dividends

Metric	HWM	TT
Dividend yield	0.22%	0.92%
Payout ratio	10.78%	31.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HWM	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.81%	10.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	50.70%	29.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	76.77%	11.84%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	49.45%	19.98%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HWM or TT?: TT has the lower trailing P/E: HWM trades at 48.57 and TT at 33.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HWM or TT?: Over the past five years, HWM grew revenue faster — HWM at a 13.81% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.
Does HWM or TT pay a bigger dividend?: HWM yields 0.22% and TT yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is HWM or TT more profitable?: HWM runs the higher net margin — HWM at 20.52% versus TT at 13.28%.
How have HWM and TT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HWM delivered 27.71% and TT delivered 26.63% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HWM analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Howmet Aerospace P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio Howmet Aerospace dividend yield Trane Technologies dividend yield Howmet Aerospace ROE Trane Technologies ROE Howmet Aerospace operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin Howmet Aerospace revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth Howmet Aerospace free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

Howmet Aerospace & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.