Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)
PH leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
$277.66Industrials
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$953.27Industrials
Total return — HWM vs PH
growth of $100 · last 30yHWM +1090.9%PH +5100.6%PH compounded faster
HWM PH
HWM vs PH: by the numbers
- •PH is the larger company ($120.19B vs $111.09B market cap).
- •PH trades at the lower earnings multiple (35.18 vs 64.42 P/E).
- •HWM converts more revenue to profit (20.22% vs 16.58% net margin).
- •HWM grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.27% vs 9.15% CAGR).
- •PH pays the higher dividend yield (0.78% vs 0.17%).
Which is better, HWM or PH?
Metric tally: HWM 8 · PH 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePH(lower P/E)
GrowthHWM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePH(higher dividend yield)
QualityHWM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HWM | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 64.42 | 35.18● |
| Forward P/E | 46.11 | 28.00● |
| P/S ratio | 12.98 | 5.81● |
| P/B ratio | 20.26 | 8.35● |
| PEG ratio | 1.73 | 1.04● |
| EV / EBITDA | 44.78 | 23.30● |
| FCF yield | 1.28% | 3.01%● |
Profitability
| Metric | HWM | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 32.56% | 37.23%● |
| Operating margin | 27.53%● | 20.87% |
| Net margin | 20.22%● | 16.58% |
| ROE | 31.58%● | 23.82% |
| ROIC | 18.19%● | 13.69% |
Dividends
| Metric | HWM | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 0.78%● |
| Payout ratio | 12.87% | 26.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HWM | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.27%● | 9.15% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 50.70%● | 24.00% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 103.64%● | 8.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 53.39%● | 29.33% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, HWM or PH?
- It depends on your goal. value: PH (lower P/E); growth: HWM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PH (higher dividend yield); quality: HWM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 9 to 8.
- Is HWM or PH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: HWM trades at a 64.42 P/E and PH at 35.18.
- Which has grown faster, HWM or PH?
- Over the past five years, HWM grew revenue faster — HWM at a 12.27% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.
- Does HWM or PH pay a bigger dividend?
- HWM yields 0.17% and PH yields 0.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is HWM or PH more profitable?
- HWM runs the higher net margin — HWM at 20.22% versus PH at 16.58%.
- Which has been the better investment, HWM or PH?
- Over the past 10-year, HWM delivered the higher annualized total return — HWM at 30.25% versus PH at 25.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Howmet Aerospace P/E ratioParker-Hannifin P/E ratioHowmet Aerospace dividend yieldParker-Hannifin dividend yieldHowmet Aerospace ROEParker-Hannifin ROEHowmet Aerospace operating marginParker-Hannifin operating marginHowmet Aerospace revenue growthParker-Hannifin revenue growthHowmet Aerospace free cash flowParker-Hannifin free cash flow
Howmet Aerospace & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.