Which has grown faster, HUT or WULF?

Over the past five years, HUT grew revenue faster — HUT at a 77.91% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.

Which has been the better investment, HUT or WULF?

Over the past 5-year, HUT delivered the higher annualized total return — HUT at 44.86% versus WULF at 11.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

HUT and WULF are evenly matched — 5 metrics each of 10.

A side-by-side comparison of Hut 8 Corp. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — HUT vs WULF

growth of $100 · last 8y

HUT +554.1%WULF +149.9%HUT compounded faster

HUT WULF

HUT vs WULF: by the numbers

•HUT is the larger company ($13.25B vs $12.91B market cap).
•Both run net losses; WULF's is the smaller (-611.46% vs -1499.56% net margin).
•HUT grew revenue faster over the past five years (77.91% vs 66.83% CAGR).

Which is better, HUT or WULF?

Metric tally: HUT 5 · WULF 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthHUT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityWULF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUT	WULF
P/S ratio	821.90	65.59●
P/B ratio	9.47●	73.78

Profitability

Metric	HUT	WULF
Gross margin	-614.63%	64.02%●
Operating margin	-2104.64%	-147.04%●
Net margin	-1499.56%	-611.46%●
ROE	-22.62%●	-470.94%
ROIC	-10.17%	-3.18%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUT	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	77.91%●	66.83%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	109.26%●	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	26.65%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	44.86%●	11.84%

Frequently asked

Which is better, HUT or WULF?: It depends on your goal. growth: HUT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: WULF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Which has grown faster, HUT or WULF?: Over the past five years, HUT grew revenue faster — HUT at a 77.91% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
Which has been the better investment, HUT or WULF?: Over the past 5-year, HUT delivered the higher annualized total return — HUT at 44.86% versus WULF at 11.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUT analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hut 8 P/E ratio TeraWulf P/E ratio Hut 8 dividend yield TeraWulf dividend yield Hut 8 ROE TeraWulf ROE Hut 8 operating margin TeraWulf operating margin Hut 8 revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth Hut 8 free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

Hut 8 & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.