Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUM or WAT?

HUM has the lower trailing P/E: HUM trades at 35.80 and WAT at 105.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HUM or WAT?

Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — HUM at a 12.61% CAGR versus WAT at 11.70%.

Does HUM or WAT pay a bigger dividend?

HUM pays a dividend (0.86% yield), while WAT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is HUM or WAT more profitable?

WAT runs the higher net margin — HUM at 0.88% versus WAT at 3.58%.

How have HUM and WAT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HUM delivered 9.71% and WAT delivered 10.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Humana Inc. (HUM) vs Waters Corporation (WAT)

A side-by-side comparison of Humana Inc. and Waters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HUM

Humana Inc.

$45.39B

$378.02HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WAT

Waters Corporation

$41.62B

$423.92HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HUM vs WAT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

HUM +148.6% (+9.5%/yr)WAT +161.7% (+10.1%/yr)WAT compounded faster over this window

HUM WAT

HUM vs WAT: by the numbers

•HUM is the larger company ($45.39B vs $41.62B market cap).
•HUM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.80 vs 105.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WAT converts more revenue to profit (3.58% vs 0.88% net margin).
•HUM grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.61% vs 11.70% CAGR).
•HUM pays a dividend (0.86% yield), while WAT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUM	WAT
P/E ratio	35.80	105.72
Forward P/E	41.30	29.09
P/S ratio	0.31	8.96
P/B ratio	2.36	2.74
EV / EBITDA	19.02	49.94
FCF yield	N/A	0.96%

Profitability

Metric	HUM	WAT
Gross margin	13.65%	50.78%
Operating margin	1.39%	28.22%
Net margin	0.88%	3.58%
ROE	6.65%	1.09%
ROIC	4.52%	1.34%

Dividends

Metric	HUM	WAT
Dividend yield	0.86%	N/A
Payout ratio	33.52%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUM	WAT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.61%	11.70%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-17.27%	5.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-17.19%	-9.10%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.39%	-0.83%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUM or WAT?: HUM has the lower trailing P/E: HUM trades at 35.80 and WAT at 105.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HUM or WAT?: Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — HUM at a 12.61% CAGR versus WAT at 11.70%.
Does HUM or WAT pay a bigger dividend?: HUM pays a dividend (0.86% yield), while WAT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is HUM or WAT more profitable?: WAT runs the higher net margin — HUM at 0.88% versus WAT at 3.58%.
How have HUM and WAT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HUM delivered 9.71% and WAT delivered 10.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUM analysis Full WAT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Humana P/E ratio Waters P/E ratio Humana dividend yield Humana ROE Waters ROE Humana operating margin Waters operating margin Humana revenue growth Waters revenue growth Humana free cash flow Waters free cash flow

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.