Humana Inc. (HUM) vs Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)
MRK leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Humana Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — HUM vs MRK
growth of $100 · last 30yHUM +1977.9%MRK +287.9%HUM compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
HUM MRK
HUM vs MRK: by the numbers
- •MRK is the larger company ($294.03B vs $45.53B market cap).
- •MRK trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.54 vs 40.56 P/E).
- •MRK converts more revenue to profit (13.62% vs 0.82% net margin).
- •HUM grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.71% vs 8.60% CAGR).
- •MRK pays the higher dividend yield (2.79% vs 0.93%).
Which is better, HUM or MRK?
Metric tally: HUM 3 · MRK 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMRK(lower P/E)
GrowthHUM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMRK(higher dividend yield)
QualityMRK(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | HUM | MRK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.56 | 33.54● |
| Forward P/E | 23.94 | 12.35● |
| P/S ratio | 0.33● | 4.49 |
| P/B ratio | 2.46● | 6.41 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.81 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.22 | 19.58 |
| FCF yield | 2.78% | 4.80%● |
Profitability
| Metric | HUM | MRK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 14.01% | 75.91%● |
| Operating margin | 1.01% | 27.59%● |
| Net margin | 0.82% | 13.62%● |
| ROE | 6.08% | 19.48%● |
| ROIC | 3.12% | 18.27%● |
Dividends
| Metric | HUM | MRK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 2.79%● |
| Payout ratio | 35.87% | 45.48% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HUM | MRK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.71%● | 8.60% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -17.27% | 21.21%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -17.19% | 15.69%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.01% | 12.79%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, HUM or MRK?
- It depends on your goal. value: MRK (lower P/E); growth: HUM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MRK (higher dividend yield); quality: MRK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MRK leads 12 to 3.
- Is HUM or MRK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MRK is cheaper: HUM trades at a 40.56 P/E and MRK at 33.54.
- Which has grown faster, HUM or MRK?
- Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — HUM at a 11.71% CAGR versus MRK at 8.60%.
- Does HUM or MRK pay a bigger dividend?
- HUM yields 0.93% and MRK yields 2.79% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is HUM or MRK more profitable?
- MRK runs the higher net margin — HUM at 0.82% versus MRK at 13.62%.
- Which has been the better investment, HUM or MRK?
- Over the past 10-year, MRK delivered the higher annualized total return — HUM at 8.24% versus MRK at 11.57%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Humana P/E ratioMerck & P/E ratioHumana dividend yieldMerck & dividend yieldHumana ROEMerck & ROEHumana operating marginMerck & operating marginHumana revenue growthMerck & revenue growthHumana free cash flowMerck & free cash flow
Humana & Merck & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.