Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUM or KR?

KR has the lower trailing P/E: HUM trades at 40.76 and KR at 33.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HUM or KR?

Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — HUM at a 11.71% CAGR versus KR at 2.33%.

Does HUM or KR pay a bigger dividend?

HUM yields 0.70% and KR yields 2.41% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is HUM or KR more profitable?

HUM runs the higher net margin — HUM at 0.82% versus KR at 0.71%.

How have HUM and KR total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HUM delivered 9.18% and KR delivered 7.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Humana Inc. (HUM) vs The Kroger Co. (KR)

A side-by-side comparison of Humana Inc. and The Kroger Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: HUM is classified in Healthcare; KR is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

HUM

Humana Inc.

$46.67B

$388.71HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:01 PM EDT

The Kroger Co.

$36.26B

$59.19Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HUM vs KR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

HUM +2489.9%KR +1667.5%HUM compounded faster

HUM KR

HUM vs KR: by the numbers

•HUM is the larger company ($46.67B vs $36.26B market cap).
•KR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.91 vs 40.76 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•HUM converts more revenue to profit (0.82% vs 0.71% net margin).
•HUM grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.71% vs 2.33% CAGR).
•KR pays the higher dividend yield (2.41% vs 0.70%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUM	KR
P/E ratio	40.76	33.91
Forward P/E	42.42	12.07
P/S ratio	0.34	0.24
P/B ratio	2.48	5.51
EV / EBITDA	25.16	10.44
FCF yield	2.77%	8.09%

Profitability

Metric	HUM	KR
Gross margin	14.01%	23.18%
Operating margin	1.01%	1.33%
Net margin	0.82%	0.71%
ROE	6.08%	16.27%
ROIC	3.12%	4.70%

Dividends

Metric	HUM	KR
Dividend yield	0.70%	2.41%
Payout ratio	26.90%	89.74%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUM	KR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.71%	2.33%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-17.27%	-13.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-17.19%	-1.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-1.91%	10.73%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUM or KR?: KR has the lower trailing P/E: HUM trades at 40.76 and KR at 33.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HUM or KR?: Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — HUM at a 11.71% CAGR versus KR at 2.33%.
Does HUM or KR pay a bigger dividend?: HUM yields 0.70% and KR yields 2.41% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is HUM or KR more profitable?: HUM runs the higher net margin — HUM at 0.82% versus KR at 0.71%.
How have HUM and KR total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HUM delivered 9.18% and KR delivered 7.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUM analysis Full KR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Humana P/E ratio Kroger P/E ratio Humana dividend yield Kroger dividend yield Humana ROE Kroger ROE Humana operating margin Kroger operating margin Humana revenue growth Kroger revenue growth Humana free cash flow Kroger free cash flow

Humana & Kroger appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.