Which has grown faster, HUBS or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 27.85% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.

Is HUBS or WULF more profitable?

HUBS runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 3.04% versus WULF at -611.46%.

Which has been the better investment, HUBS or WULF?

Over the past 10-year, HUBS delivered the higher annualized total return — HUBS at 15.75% versus WULF at 9.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

HUBS leads on 8 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of HubSpot, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 2, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — HUBS vs WULF

growth of $100 · last 12y

HUBS +523.0%WULF +27.7%HUBS compounded faster

HUBS WULF

HUBS vs WULF: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($10.50B vs $9.84B market cap).
•HUBS is profitable (3.04% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 27.85% CAGR).

Which is better, HUBS or WULF?

Metric tally: HUBS 8 · WULF 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityHUBS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUBS	WULF
P/E ratio	98.38	—
P/S ratio	2.99●	59.35
P/B ratio	4.94●	66.76
PEG ratio	0.52	—
EV / EBITDA	44.31	—
FCF yield	7.22%	—

Profitability

Metric	HUBS	WULF
Gross margin	83.65%●	50.93%
Operating margin	1.95%●	-101.10%
Net margin	3.04%●	-611.46%
ROE	5.02%●	-470.94%
ROIC	0.31%●	-3.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUBS	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	27.85%	66.83%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	57.18%●	26.65%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-20.52%	3.85%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, HUBS or WULF?: It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: HUBS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, HUBS leads 8 to 2.
Which has grown faster, HUBS or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 27.85% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
Is HUBS or WULF more profitable?: HUBS runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 3.04% versus WULF at -611.46%.
Which has been the better investment, HUBS or WULF?: Over the past 10-year, HUBS delivered the higher annualized total return — HUBS at 15.75% versus WULF at 9.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUBS analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

HubSpot P/E ratio TeraWulf P/E ratio HubSpot dividend yield TeraWulf dividend yield HubSpot ROE TeraWulf ROE HubSpot operating margin TeraWulf operating margin HubSpot revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth HubSpot free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

HubSpot & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 2, 2026.