Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBB or OTIS?

OTIS has the lower trailing P/E: HUBB trades at 26.26 and OTIS at 17.66. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HUBB or OTIS?

Over the past five years, HUBB grew revenue faster — HUBB at a 8.41% CAGR versus OTIS at 1.46%.

Does HUBB or OTIS pay a bigger dividend?

HUBB yields 1.23% and OTIS yields 2.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is HUBB or OTIS more profitable?

HUBB runs the higher net margin — HUBB at 14.49% versus OTIS at 10.17%.

How have HUBB and OTIS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, HUBB delivered 20.92% and OTIS delivered -3.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) vs Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS)

A side-by-side comparison of Hubbell Incorporated and Otis Worldwide Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HUBB

Hubbell Incorporated

$23.42B

$443.23IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 17, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

OTIS

Otis Worldwide Corporation

$26.15B

$68.70IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 17, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HUBB vs OTIS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

HUBB +407.5% (+31.1%/yr)OTIS +69.2% (+9.2%/yr)HUBB compounded faster over this window

HUBB OTIS

HUBB vs OTIS: by the numbers

•OTIS is the larger company ($26.15B vs $23.42B market cap).
•OTIS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.66 vs 26.26 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•HUBB converts more revenue to profit (14.49% vs 10.17% net margin).
•HUBB grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.41% vs 1.46% CAGR).
•OTIS pays the higher dividend yield (2.49% vs 1.23%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUBB	OTIS
P/E ratio	26.26	17.66
Forward P/E	21.67	16.98
P/S ratio	3.76	1.75
P/B ratio	5.97	N/A
EV / EBITDA	18.98	13.89
FCF yield	3.85%	6.55%

Profitability

Metric	HUBB	OTIS
Gross margin	35.20%	30.17%
Operating margin	20.21%	15.35%
Net margin	14.49%	10.17%
ROE	22.99%	N/A
ROIC	9.55%	40.31%

Dividends

Metric	HUBB	OTIS
Dividend yield	1.23%	2.49%
Payout ratio	33.65%	44.22%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUBB	OTIS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.41%	1.46%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.82%	11.05%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.35%	1.61%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.92%	-3.67%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBB or OTIS?: OTIS has the lower trailing P/E: HUBB trades at 26.26 and OTIS at 17.66. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HUBB or OTIS?: Over the past five years, HUBB grew revenue faster — HUBB at a 8.41% CAGR versus OTIS at 1.46%.
Does HUBB or OTIS pay a bigger dividend?: HUBB yields 1.23% and OTIS yields 2.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is HUBB or OTIS more profitable?: HUBB runs the higher net margin — HUBB at 14.49% versus OTIS at 10.17%.
How have HUBB and OTIS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, HUBB delivered 20.92% and OTIS delivered -3.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUBB analysis Full OTIS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hubbell P/E ratio Otis Worldwide P/E ratio Hubbell dividend yield Otis Worldwide dividend yield Hubbell ROE Otis Worldwide ROE Hubbell operating margin Otis Worldwide operating margin Hubbell revenue growth Otis Worldwide revenue growth Hubbell free cash flow Otis Worldwide free cash flow

Hubbell & Otis Worldwide appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.