Which has grown faster, HTZ or SWBI?

Over the past five years, HTZ grew revenue faster — HTZ at a 9.47% CAGR versus SWBI at -12.97%.

Does HTZ or SWBI pay a bigger dividend?

SWBI pays a dividend (3.55% yield), while HTZ has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is HTZ or SWBI more profitable?

SWBI runs the higher net margin — HTZ at -3.13% versus SWBI at 4.44%.

How have HTZ and SWBI total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, HTZ delivered -39.54% and SWBI delivered -3.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ) vs Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI)

A side-by-side comparison of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HTZ

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.

$658M

$2.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:15 PM EDT

SWBI

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.

$654M

$14.63IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:10 PM EDT

Total return — HTZ vs SWBI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

HTZ -93.4% (-41.9%/yr)SWBI -40.0% (-9.7%/yr)SWBI compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

HTZ SWBI

HTZ vs SWBI: by the numbers

•HTZ is the larger company ($658M vs $654M market cap).
•SWBI is profitable (4.44% net margin) while HTZ runs a net loss (-3.13%).
•HTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.47% vs -12.97% CAGR).
•SWBI pays a dividend (3.55% yield), while HTZ has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HTZ	SWBI
P/E ratio	N/A	26.93
Forward P/E	N/A	24.80
P/S ratio	0.07	1.19
P/B ratio	N/A	1.75
EV / EBITDA	8.62	10.57
FCF yield	N/A	12.54%

Profitability

Metric	HTZ	SWBI
Gross margin	14.15%	27.44%
Operating margin	2.80%	6.61%
Net margin	-3.13%	4.44%
ROE	N/A	6.55%
ROIC	1.15%	5.91%

Dividends

Metric	HTZ	SWBI
Dividend yield	N/A	3.55%
Payout ratio	N/A	95.73%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HTZ	SWBI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.47%	-12.97%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-38.10%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-23.84%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-39.54%	-3.38%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, HTZ or SWBI?: Over the past five years, HTZ grew revenue faster — HTZ at a 9.47% CAGR versus SWBI at -12.97%.
Does HTZ or SWBI pay a bigger dividend?: SWBI pays a dividend (3.55% yield), while HTZ has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HTZ or SWBI more profitable?: SWBI runs the higher net margin — HTZ at -3.13% versus SWBI at 4.44%.
How have HTZ and SWBI total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, HTZ delivered -39.54% and SWBI delivered -3.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HTZ analysis Full SWBI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Smith & Wesson Brands P/E ratio Smith & Wesson Brands dividend yield Hertz Global ROE Smith & Wesson Brands ROE Hertz Global operating margin Smith & Wesson Brands operating margin Hertz Global revenue growth Smith & Wesson Brands revenue growth Hertz Global free cash flow Smith & Wesson Brands free cash flow

Hertz Global & Smith & Wesson Brands appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.