Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
UHS leads on 14 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Henry Schein, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
HSIC
Henry Schein, Inc.
$84.95Healthcare
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$145.69Healthcare
Total return — HSIC vs UHS
growth of $100 · last 30yHSIC +1116.1%UHS +2141.4%UHS compounded faster
HSIC UHS
HSIC vs UHS: by the numbers
- •HSIC is the larger company ($9.68B vs $9.12B market cap).
- •UHS trades at the lower earnings multiple (6.11 vs 25.66 P/E).
- •UHS converts more revenue to profit (8.56% vs 2.95% net margin).
- •UHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 4.74% CAGR).
- •UHS pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while HSIC does not currently pay one.
Which is better, HSIC or UHS?
Metric tally: HSIC 2 · UHS 14It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUHS(lower P/E)
GrowthUHS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityUHS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HSIC | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.66 | 6.11● |
| Forward P/E | 15.88 | 6.21● |
| P/S ratio | 0.74 | 0.51● |
| P/B ratio | 3.02 | 1.19● |
| PEG ratio | 3.23 | 0.26● |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.78 | 5.25● |
| FCF yield | 4.37% | 9.94%● |
Profitability
| Metric | HSIC | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.69% | 90.45%● |
| Operating margin | 5.60% | 11.50%● |
| Net margin | 2.95% | 8.56%● |
| ROE | 12.09% | 20.19%● |
| ROIC | 6.58% | 11.29%● |
Dividends
| Metric | HSIC | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.55% |
| Payout ratio | — | 3.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HSIC | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.74% | 8.63%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.74% | 16.19%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -4.53%● | -4.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.52%● | -0.22% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, HSIC or UHS?
- It depends on your goal. value: UHS (lower P/E); growth: UHS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: UHS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UHS leads 14 to 2.
- Is HSIC or UHS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UHS is cheaper: HSIC trades at a 25.66 P/E and UHS at 6.11.
- Which has grown faster, HSIC or UHS?
- Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — HSIC at a 4.74% CAGR versus UHS at 8.63%.
- Does HSIC or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- UHS pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while HSIC does not currently pay one.
- Is HSIC or UHS more profitable?
- UHS runs the higher net margin — HSIC at 2.95% versus UHS at 8.56%.
- Which has been the better investment, HSIC or UHS?
- Over the past 10-year, HSIC delivered the higher annualized total return — HSIC at 2.40% versus UHS at 1.10%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Henry Schein P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioHenry Schein dividend yieldUniversal Health Services dividend yieldHenry Schein ROEUniversal Health Services ROEHenry Schein operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginHenry Schein revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthHenry Schein free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
Henry Schein & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.