Which has grown faster, HSDT or WHF?

Over the past five years, HSDT grew revenue faster — HSDT at a 90.85% CAGR versus WHF at -6.80%.

Does HSDT or WHF pay a bigger dividend?

WHF pays a dividend (14.80% yield), while HSDT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is HSDT or WHF more profitable?

WHF runs the higher net margin — HSDT at -1302.78% versus WHF at 37.23%.

How have HSDT and WHF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HSDT delivered -77.21% and WHF delivered 8.59% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Solana Company (HSDT) vs WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF)

A side-by-side comparison of Solana Company and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HSDT

Solana Company

$155M

$2.66Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WHF

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.

$150M

$7.00Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HSDT vs WHF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

HSDT -100.0% (-77.2%/yr)WHF +129.9% (+8.7%/yr)WHF compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

HSDT WHF

HSDT vs WHF: by the numbers

•HSDT is the larger company ($155M vs $150M market cap).
•WHF is profitable (37.23% net margin) while HSDT runs a net loss (-1302.78%).
•HSDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (90.85% vs -6.80% CAGR).
•WHF pays a dividend (14.80% yield), while HSDT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HSDT	WHF
P/E ratio	N/A	8.92
Forward P/E	N/A	7.23
P/S ratio	12.87	3.19
P/B ratio	0.94	0.59

Profitability

Metric	HSDT	WHF
Gross margin	95.53%	52.31%
Operating margin	-351.02%	100.89%
Net margin	-1302.78%	37.23%
ROE	-94.95%	6.94%

Dividends

Metric	HSDT	WHF
Dividend yield	N/A	14.80%
Payout ratio	N/A	133.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HSDT	WHF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	90.85%	-6.80%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-16.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-91.26%	-1.87%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, HSDT or WHF?: Over the past five years, HSDT grew revenue faster — HSDT at a 90.85% CAGR versus WHF at -6.80%.
Does HSDT or WHF pay a bigger dividend?: WHF pays a dividend (14.80% yield), while HSDT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HSDT or WHF more profitable?: WHF runs the higher net margin — HSDT at -1302.78% versus WHF at 37.23%.
How have HSDT and WHF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HSDT delivered -77.21% and WHF delivered 8.59% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HSDT analysis Full WHF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

WhiteHorse Finance P/E ratio WhiteHorse Finance dividend yield Solana ROE WhiteHorse Finance ROE Solana operating margin WhiteHorse Finance operating margin Solana revenue growth WhiteHorse Finance revenue growth

Solana & WhiteHorse Finance appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.