Which has the lower trailing P/E, HRZN or RILYP?

RILYP has the lower trailing P/E: HRZN trades at 13.13 and RILYP at 0.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HRZN or RILYP?

Over the past five years, HRZN grew revenue faster — HRZN at a 32.13% CAGR versus RILYP at 4.32%.

Does HRZN or RILYP pay a bigger dividend?

HRZN pays a dividend (24.24% yield), while RILYP is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is HRZN or RILYP more profitable?

RILYP runs the higher net margin — HRZN at 4.62% versus RILYP at 31.34%.

How have HRZN and RILYP total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, HRZN delivered -11.36% and RILYP delivered -12.73% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) vs BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILYP)

A side-by-side comparison of Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and BRC Group Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HRZN

Horizon Technology Finance Corporation

$229M

$4.58Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

RILYP

BRC Group Holdings, Inc.

$207M

$9.28Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — HRZN vs RILYP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

HRZN -6.6% (-1.0%/yr)RILYP -37.5% (-6.5%/yr)HRZN compounded faster over this window

HRZN RILYP

HRZN vs RILYP: by the numbers

•HRZN is the larger company ($229M vs $207M market cap).
•RILYP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (0.70 vs 13.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RILYP converts more revenue to profit (31.34% vs 4.62% net margin).
•HRZN grew revenue faster over the past five years (32.13% vs 4.32% CAGR).
•HRZN pays a dividend (24.24% yield), while RILYP is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HRZN	RILYP
P/E ratio	13.13	0.70
Forward P/E	6.79	N/A
PEG ratio	N/A	0.13
P/S ratio	2.09	0.16
P/B ratio	0.55	1.45

Profitability

Metric	HRZN	RILYP
Gross margin	18.03%	64.98%
Operating margin	-3.99%	14.62%
Net margin	4.62%	31.34%
ROE	1.21%	289.61%

Dividends

Metric	HRZN	RILYP
Dividend yield	24.24%	N/A
Payout ratio	318.33%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HRZN	RILYP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	32.13%	4.32%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	4.59%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-11.36%	-12.73%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HRZN or RILYP?: RILYP has the lower trailing P/E: HRZN trades at 13.13 and RILYP at 0.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HRZN or RILYP?: Over the past five years, HRZN grew revenue faster — HRZN at a 32.13% CAGR versus RILYP at 4.32%.
Does HRZN or RILYP pay a bigger dividend?: HRZN pays a dividend (24.24% yield), while RILYP is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is HRZN or RILYP more profitable?: RILYP runs the higher net margin — HRZN at 4.62% versus RILYP at 31.34%.
How have HRZN and RILYP total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, HRZN delivered -11.36% and RILYP delivered -12.73% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HRZN analysis Full RILYP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Horizon Technology Finance P/E ratio BRC Group P/E ratio Horizon Technology Finance dividend yield Horizon Technology Finance ROE BRC Group ROE Horizon Technology Finance operating margin BRC Group operating margin Horizon Technology Finance revenue growth BRC Group revenue growth

Horizon Technology Finance & BRC Group appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.