Which has the lower trailing P/E, HPQ or SMCI?

HPQ has the lower trailing P/E: HPQ trades at 12.23 and SMCI at 12.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HPQ or SMCI?

Over the past five years, SMCI grew revenue faster — HPQ at a -0.96% CAGR versus SMCI at 61.49%.

Does HPQ or SMCI pay a bigger dividend?

HPQ pays a dividend (3.38% yield), while SMCI has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is HPQ or SMCI more profitable?

SMCI runs the higher net margin — HPQ at 4.14% versus SMCI at 5.71%.

How have HPQ and SMCI total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HPQ delivered 13.56% and SMCI delivered 34.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

HP Inc. (HPQ) vs Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI)

A side-by-side comparison of HP Inc. and Super Micro Computer, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HPQ

HP Inc.

$29.30B

$32.04TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SMCI

Super Micro Computer, Inc.

$26.87B

$41.54TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HPQ vs SMCI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

HPQ +243.2% (+13.1%/yr)SMCI +1773.8% (+34.1%/yr)SMCI compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

HPQ SMCI

HPQ vs SMCI: by the numbers

•HPQ is the larger company ($29.30B vs $26.87B market cap).
•HPQ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.23 vs 12.74 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SMCI converts more revenue to profit (5.71% vs 4.14% net margin).
•SMCI grew revenue faster over the past five years (61.49% vs -0.96% CAGR).
•HPQ pays a dividend (3.38% yield), while SMCI has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HPQ	SMCI
P/E ratio	12.23	12.74
Forward P/E	9.84	9.57
P/S ratio	0.50	0.69
P/B ratio	N/A	1.86
EV / EBITDA	8.60	9.07
FCF yield	13.25%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	HPQ	SMCI
Gross margin	19.78%	10.82%
Operating margin	5.64%	7.09%
Net margin	4.14%	5.71%
ROE	N/A	15.40%
ROIC	22.46%	9.73%

Dividends

Metric	HPQ	SMCI
Dividend yield	3.38%	N/A
Payout ratio	45.80%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HPQ	SMCI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.96%	61.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.84%	46.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-4.59%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.87%	61.38%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HPQ or SMCI?: HPQ has the lower trailing P/E: HPQ trades at 12.23 and SMCI at 12.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HPQ or SMCI?: Over the past five years, SMCI grew revenue faster — HPQ at a -0.96% CAGR versus SMCI at 61.49%.
Does HPQ or SMCI pay a bigger dividend?: HPQ pays a dividend (3.38% yield), while SMCI has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HPQ or SMCI more profitable?: SMCI runs the higher net margin — HPQ at 4.14% versus SMCI at 5.71%.
How have HPQ and SMCI total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HPQ delivered 13.56% and SMCI delivered 34.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HPQ analysis Full SMCI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

HP P/E ratio Super Micro Computer P/E ratio HP dividend yield HP ROE Super Micro Computer ROE HP operating margin Super Micro Computer operating margin HP revenue growth Super Micro Computer revenue growth HP free cash flow Super Micro Computer free cash flow

HP & Super Micro Computer appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.