Which has the lower trailing P/E, HPQ or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: HPQ trades at 9.80 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HPQ or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — HPQ at a -1.23% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Does HPQ or NA pay a bigger dividend?

HPQ pays a dividend (4.48% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is HPQ or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — HPQ at 4.45% versus NA at 505.49%.

HP Inc. (HPQ) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of HP Inc. and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HPQ

HP Inc.

$25.87B

$28.29TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HPQ vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

HPQ -3.1%NA -98.4%HPQ compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

HPQ NA

HPQ vs NA: by the numbers

•HPQ is the larger company ($25.87B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 9.80 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 4.45% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs -1.23% CAGR).
•HPQ pays a dividend (4.48% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HPQ	NA
P/E ratio	9.80	2.30
Forward P/E	8.78	N/A
P/S ratio	0.43	11.40
P/B ratio	N/A	0.41
PEG ratio	1.68	N/A
EV / EBITDA	7.61	6.44
FCF yield	15.38%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	HPQ	NA
Gross margin	20.21%	-147.33%
Operating margin	5.51%	-396.84%
Net margin	4.45%	505.49%
ROE	-730.92%	17.96%
ROIC	24.97%	-10.96%

Dividends

Metric	HPQ	NA
Dividend yield	4.48%	N/A
Payout ratio	44.55%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HPQ	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.23%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.84%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-7.31%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.72%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HPQ or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: HPQ trades at 9.80 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HPQ or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — HPQ at a -1.23% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Does HPQ or NA pay a bigger dividend?: HPQ pays a dividend (4.48% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HPQ or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — HPQ at 4.45% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full HPQ analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

HP P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio HP dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield HP ROE Nano Labs ROE HP operating margin Nano Labs operating margin HP revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth HP free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

HP & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.