Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc. (HOWL) vs Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX)

A side-by-side comparison of Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc. and Nano-X Imaging Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — HOWL vs NNOX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y
HOWL -94.2% (-43.5%/yr)NNOX -98.1% (-54.7%/yr)HOWL compounded faster over this window
050100Start $10020222023202420252026$6$2
HOWL NNOX

HOWL vs NNOX: by the numbers

  • •HOWL is the larger company ($45M vs $44M market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; HOWL's is the smaller (-164.82% vs -747.20% net margin).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricHOWLNNOX
P/S ratio2.152.83
P/B ratio2.770.61

Profitability

MetricHOWLNNOX
Gross margin0.00%-98.21%
Operating margin0.00%-466.16%
Net margin-164.82%-747.20%
ROE-212.45%-161.19%
ROIC-156.97%-127.36%

Growth (annualized)

MetricHOWLNNOX
Total return CAGR (5Y)-44.27%-51.28%

Frequently asked

How have HOWL and NNOX total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, HOWL delivered -44.27% and NNOX delivered -51.28% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.