Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) vs Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW)
LOW leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Lowe's Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
$345.95Consumer Cyclical
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
$220.78Consumer Cyclical
Total return — HLT vs LOW
growth of $100 · last 12yHLT +684.3%LOW +370.8%HLT compounded faster
HLT LOW
HLT vs LOW: by the numbers
- •LOW is the larger company ($123.79B vs $78.75B market cap).
- •LOW trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.66 vs 52.82 P/E).
- •HLT converts more revenue to profit (12.56% vs 7.51% net margin).
- •HLT grew revenue faster over the past five years (30.37% vs -1.28% CAGR).
- •LOW pays the higher dividend yield (2.17% vs 0.17%).
Which is better, HLT or LOW?
Metric tally: HLT 7 · LOW 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLOW(lower P/E)
GrowthHLT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLOW(higher dividend yield)
QualityLOW(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | HLT | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 52.82 | 18.66● |
| Forward P/E | 33.33 | 16.43● |
| P/S ratio | 6.54 | 1.40● |
| PEG ratio | 4.27 | 1.36● |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.86 | 13.61● |
| FCF yield | 2.69% | 6.16%● |
Profitability
| Metric | HLT | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.29%● | 33.80% |
| Operating margin | 23.08%● | 11.55% |
| Net margin | 12.56%● | 7.51% |
| ROE | -27.04%● | -67.10% |
| ROIC | 11.29% | 20.42%● |
Dividends
| Metric | HLT | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 2.17%● |
| Payout ratio | 9.71% | 40.44% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HLT | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 30.37%● | -1.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.36% | 13.72%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 45.28%● | -3.63% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 22.20%● | 4.93% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, HLT or LOW?
- It depends on your goal. value: LOW (lower P/E); growth: HLT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LOW (higher dividend yield); quality: LOW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LOW leads 9 to 7.
- Is HLT or LOW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LOW is cheaper: HLT trades at a 52.82 P/E and LOW at 18.66.
- Which has grown faster, HLT or LOW?
- Over the past five years, HLT grew revenue faster — HLT at a 30.37% CAGR versus LOW at -1.28%.
- Does HLT or LOW pay a bigger dividend?
- HLT yields 0.17% and LOW yields 2.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is HLT or LOW more profitable?
- HLT runs the higher net margin — HLT at 12.56% versus LOW at 7.51%.
- Which has been the better investment, HLT or LOW?
- Over the past 10-year, HLT delivered the higher annualized total return — HLT at 23.59% versus LOW at 12.99%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Hilton Worldwide P/E ratioLowe's Companies P/E ratioHilton Worldwide dividend yieldLowe's Companies dividend yieldHilton Worldwide ROELowe's Companies ROEHilton Worldwide operating marginLowe's Companies operating marginHilton Worldwide revenue growthLowe's Companies revenue growthHilton Worldwide free cash flowLowe's Companies free cash flow
Hilton Worldwide & Lowe's Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.